Literature DB >> 15752149

The highly variable RH locus in nonwhite persons hampers RHD zygosity determination but yields more insight into RH-related evolutionary events.

Martine G H M Grootkerk-Tax1, Petra A Maaskant-van Wijk, Judith van Drunen, C Ellen van der Schoot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about paternal RHD hemi- or homozygosity is of clinical interest in alloimmunized pregnant women. D negativity in white persons is usually caused by deletion of the RHD gene. Recently, the physical structure of the RH locus and the mechanism causing the deletion of the RHD gene have been explored, enabling RHD zygosity determination in white persons by specific detection of a hybrid Rhesus box characteristic for the RHD- locus. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RHD zygosity was determined in 402 samples from five different ethnic groups by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism and by a newly developed real-time quantitative PCR. The Rhesus boxes of samples showing discrepancies between both tests were cycle sequenced.
RESULTS: In nonwhite persons, several mutated Rhesus boxes exist that hamper zygosity determination by detection of the RHD- locus. Such mutated Rhesus boxes in D+RHD homozygous black persons have a frequency of 0.22. In white persons, no mutated Rhesus boxes were encountered so far.
CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the high frequency of the mutated Rhesus boxes, zygosity determination by detection of the RHD- locus is not feasible in nonwhite persons. The cosegregation of variant RHD genes (RHDpsi and (C)cdes) with specific mutated Rhesus boxes yields more insight into the evolutionary events concerning variant RHD genes and mutated Rhesus boxes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15752149     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04199.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  7 in total

1.  Weak D in the Tunisian population.

Authors:  Mouna Ouchari; Houda Romdhane; Taher Chakroun; Saida Abdelkefi; Batoul Houissa; Slama Hmida; Saloua Jemni Yacoub
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  RHCE*ceTI encodes partial c and partial e and is often in cis to RHD*DIVa.

Authors:  Connie M Westhoff; Sunitha Vege; Christine Halter Hipsky; Kim Hue-Roye; Tamara Copeland; Randall W Velliquette; Trina Horn; Christine Lomas-Francis; Marion E Reid
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  A novel laboratory technique demonstrating the influences of RHD zygosity and the RhCcEe phenotype on erythrocyte D antigen expression.

Authors:  Patrick T McGann; Jenny M Despotovic; Thad A Howard; Russell E Ware
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Transfusion support during childbirth for a woman with anti-U and the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele.

Authors:  Q Yin; K Srivastava; D G Brust; W A Flegel
Journal:  Immunohematology       Date:  2021-03

5.  Validated Reference Panel from Renewable Source of Genomic DNA Available for Standardization of Blood Group Genotyping.

Authors:  Evgeniya Volkova; Emilia Sippert; Meihong Liu; Teresita Mercado; Gregory A Denomme; Orieji Illoh; Zhugong Liu; Maria Rios
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Paternal RHD zygosity determination in Tunisians: evaluation of three molecular tests.

Authors:  Narjes Kacem; Saloua Jemni-Yacoub; Jacques Chiaroni; Pascal Bailly; Monique Silvy
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  The Significance of RHD Genotyping and Characteristic Analysis in Chinese RhD Variant Individuals.

Authors:  Yanling Ying; Jingjing Zhang; Xiaozhen Hong; Xianguo Xu; Ji He; Faming Zhu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.