Literature DB >> 15751815

Impact of external quality assessment on antinuclear antibody detection performance.

B-N Pham1, S Albarede, A Guyard, E Burg, P Maisonneuve.   

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate performance of the clinical laboratories for the detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by using indirect immunofluorescence method (IIF), in France. A national external quality assessment (EQA) on ANA detection was organized by the French health products safety agency once a year since 1998. Between 606 to 687 laboratories together with six university reference laboratories experienced in performing tests in autoimmunity participated in the six-year consecutive survey. Each laboratory had to answer to methodological procedures and give coded responses. Variability in IIF methodological procedure was observed. Use of inappropriate microscope magnifications for reading slides or nonconventional cutoff dilution of serum were pointed out to concerned laboratories. Concerning ANA measurement, the rate of good responses ranged from 92.7% to 99.5% of the laboratories when the samples contained ANA. A wide dispersion of ANA titers obtained on a same sample was repeatly observed every year. Misinterpretation of particular fluorescence pattern was noticed. On ANA negative sample, the rate of good responses was 94.3%. In conclusion, ANA detection in routine practice is far from being standardized. However, EQA may have an impact on ANA detection performance when it is conducted on several consecutive year surveys, by providing advice for participating laboratories to limit inter laboratory variations related to methodological procedures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15751815     DOI: 10.1191/0961203305lu2069oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lupus        ISSN: 0961-2033            Impact factor:   2.911


  7 in total

1.  The burden of the variability introduced by the HEp-2 assay kit and the CAD system in ANA indirect immunofluorescence test.

Authors:  M Infantino; F Meacci; V Grossi; M Manfredi; M Benucci; M Merone; P Soda
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  A Multicenter Analysis of Subjectivity of Indirect Immunofluorescence Test in Antinuclear Antibody Screening.

Authors:  Vildan Turan Faraşat; Talat Ecemiş; Yavuz Doğan; Aslı Gamze Şener; Gülfem Terek Ece; Pınar Erbay Dündar; Tamer Şanlidağ
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.472

Review 3.  Standardization and Quality Assessment Under the Perspective of Automated Computer-Assisted HEp-2 Immunofluorescence Assay Systems.

Authors:  Luigi Cinquanta; Nicola Bizzaro; Giampaola Pesce
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Clinical relevance of HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescent patterns: the International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP) perspective.

Authors:  Jan Damoiseaux; Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade; Orlando Gabriel Carballo; Karsten Conrad; Paulo Luiz Carvalho Francescantonio; Marvin J Fritzler; Ignacio Garcia de la Torre; Manfred Herold; Werner Klotz; Wilson de Melo Cruvinel; Tsuneyo Mimori; Carlos von Muhlen; Minoru Satoh; Edward K Chan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Idiopathic and immune-related pulmonary fibrosis: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Authors:  Andrew McLean-Tooke; Irene Moore; Fiona Lake
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2019-11-05

6.  New findings associated with presumptive systemic lupus erythematosus in a kitten.

Authors:  Romain Huvé; Pascal Fontaine; Marie-Claude Blais; Bérénice Conversy
Journal:  JFMS Open Rep       Date:  2020-12-21

7.  A comparison of anti-nuclear antibody quantification using automated enzyme immunoassays and immunofluorescence assays.

Authors:  Renata Baronaite; Merete Engelhart; Troels Mørk Hansen; Gorm Thamsborg; Hanne Slott Jensen; Steen Stender; Pal Bela Szecsi
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2014-01-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.