OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of inequalities in availability and utilisation of HIV services across South Africa. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Three districts reflecting different socio-economic conditions, but with similar levels of HIV infection, were purposively sampled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability and utilisation of HIV services and management and support structures for programmes were assessed through the collection of secondary data supplemented by site visits. RESULTS: There were marked inequalities in service delivery between the three sites. Compared with two poorer sites, clinics at the urban site had greater availability of HIV services, including voluntary counselling and testing (100% v. 52% and 24% respectively), better uptake of this service (59 v. 9 and 5.5 clients per 1000 adults respectively) and greater distribution of condoms (15.6 v. 8.2 condoms per adult male per year). Extra counsellors had also been employed at the urban site in contrast to the other 2 sites. The urban site also had far more intensive management support and monitoring, with 1 manager per 12 health facilities compared with 1 manager per more than 90 health facilities at the other 2 sites. CONCLUSION: The process of scaling up of HIV services seems to be accentuating inequalities. The urban site in this study was better able to utilise the extra resources. In contrast, the poorer sites have thus far been unable to scale up the response to HIV even with the availability of extra resources. Unless policy makers pay more attention to equity, efficacious interventions may prove to be of limited effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of inequalities in availability and utilisation of HIV services across South Africa. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Three districts reflecting different socio-economic conditions, but with similar levels of HIV infection, were purposively sampled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability and utilisation of HIV services and management and support structures for programmes were assessed through the collection of secondary data supplemented by site visits. RESULTS: There were marked inequalities in service delivery between the three sites. Compared with two poorer sites, clinics at the urban site had greater availability of HIV services, including voluntary counselling and testing (100% v. 52% and 24% respectively), better uptake of this service (59 v. 9 and 5.5 clients per 1000 adults respectively) and greater distribution of condoms (15.6 v. 8.2 condoms per adult male per year). Extra counsellors had also been employed at the urban site in contrast to the other 2 sites. The urban site also had far more intensive management support and monitoring, with 1 manager per 12 health facilities compared with 1 manager per more than 90 health facilities at the other 2 sites. CONCLUSION: The process of scaling up of HIV services seems to be accentuating inequalities. The urban site in this study was better able to utilise the extra resources. In contrast, the poorer sites have thus far been unable to scale up the response to HIV even with the availability of extra resources. Unless policy makers pay more attention to equity, efficacious interventions may prove to be of limited effectiveness.
Authors: Cesar Gomes Victora; Gary Joseph; Inacio C M Silva; Fatima S Maia; J Patrick Vaughan; Fernando C Barros; Aluisio J D Barros Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Janneke H van Dijk; Catherine G Sutcliffe; Bornface Munsanje; Francis Hamangaba; Philip E Thuma; William J Moss Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 3.090