Literature DB >> 15750855

The effects of a National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on social disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in Massachusetts.

Melissa J Liu1, Helen Hawk, Susan T Gershman, Suzanne M Smith, Ruth Karacek, Mary Lou Woodford, John Z Ayanian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess social disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by comparing the stage at diagnosis and treatment of women diagnosed with breast cancer through a National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) for low income and uninsured women in Massachusetts, the Women's Health Network (WHN), to other breast cancer patients in the state.
METHODS: We linked data from the WHN and the Massachusetts Cancer Registry (MCR). We compared 331 WHN women and 13,372 other breast cancer patients in Massachusetts diagnosed from 1995 to 1999. We used logistic regression, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, marital status, region of residence, and stage, where appropriate.
RESULTS: Compared to other breast cancer patients reported to the MCR, WHN women were just as likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage (III or IV), treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy, and treated with complete mastectomy versus partial mastectomy. WHN women were less likely to receive radiation therapy (odds ratio = 0.7; 95% confidence interval = 0.6-0.9), particularly after partial mastectomy, and had a slightly longer time from diagnosis to treatment than other breast cancer patients (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Women diagnosed with breast cancer through a NBCCEDP in Massachusetts had similar stage and treatment patterns as other breast cancer patients in the state, except for the use of radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15750855     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-1289-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  14 in total

1.  Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among low-income women with access to mammography.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; John Z Ayanian; Jennifer D Allen; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Comparing Breast Cancer Outcomes Between Medicaid and the Ohio Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Paul M Bakaki; Mark Schluchter; Cynthia Owusu; Gregory S Cooper; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Timely care after an abnormal mammogram among low-income women in a public breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; Jennifer D Allen; Karen M Emmons; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16

4.  The Impact of Near-Universal Insurance Coverage on Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Evidence from Massachusetts.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography.

Authors:  Karen Donelan; Johanna R Mailhot; David Dutwin; Kristen Barnicle; Sarah Abernethy Oo; Karin Hobrecker; Sanja Percac-Lima; Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Factors affecting receipt of chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Libby Morimoto; Jenna Coalson; Fionna Mowat; Cynthia O'Malley
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

7.  Disparities in the prevalence of comorbidities among US adults by state Medicaid expansion status.

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; Megha Jha; Justin Xavier Moore; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Sharon Humiston; Amna Idris; Shirley X L Li; Patricia Ford; Raymond Specht; Stephen Marcus; Michael Mendoza; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  W J Louwman; L V van de Poll-Franse; J Fracheboud; J A Roukema; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Insurance Status Predicts Survival in Women with Breast Cancer: Results of Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program in California.

Authors:  Rebecca A Nelson; Zeynep Bostanci; Veronica Jones; Joanne Mortimer; Amy Polverini; Lesley Taylor; Lisa Yee; John H Yim; Laura Kruper
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.