Literature DB >> 15750359

A pilot, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of individualized homeopathy for symptoms of estrogen withdrawal in breast-cancer survivors.

Elizabeth A Thompson1, Alan Montgomery, Diane Douglas, David Reilly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To pilot an investigation of individualized homeopathy for symptoms of estrogen withdrawal in breast cancer survivors.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING: Outpatient department of a National Health Service (NHS) homeopathic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven (57) women met inclusion criteria and 53 were randomized to the study. INTERVENTION: After 2 weeks of baseline assessment, all participants received a consultation plus either oral homeopathic medicine or placebo, assessed every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the activity score and profile score of the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP).
RESULTS: Eighty-five percent (85%) (45/53) of women completed the study. There was no evidence of a difference seen between groups for either activity (adjusted difference =-0.4, 95% confidence interval CI -1.0 to 0.2, p = 0.17) or profile scores (adjusted difference = -0.4, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.1, p = 0.13) using this trial design, although post hoc power calculations suggests that 65-175 would be needed per group to detect differences of this magnitude with sufficient precision. Clinically relevant improvements in symptoms and mood disturbance were seen for both groups over the study period.
CONCLUSION: Improvements were seen for symptom scores over the study period. However, presuming these improvements were caused by the individualized homeopathic approach, the study failed to show clearly that the specific effect of the remedy added further to the nonspecific effects of the consultation. Future trial design must ensure adequate power to account for the nonspecific impact of such complex individualized interventions while pragmatic designs may more readily answer questions of clinical and cost effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15750359     DOI: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Altern Complement Med        ISSN: 1075-5535            Impact factor:   2.579


  11 in total

Review 1.  Effects of non-pharmacological supportive care for hot flushes in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Tao; Xiao-Mei Tao; Chun-Li Song
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Patterns of 21-gene assay testing and chemotherapy use in black and white breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Suzanne C O'Neill; Asma Dilawari; Sara Horton; Fikru A Hirpa; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Homeopathy effects in patients during oncological treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Wagenknecht; Jennifer Dörfler; Maren Freuding; Lena Josfeld; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha R Cohen; Gary Deng; Jillian A Johnson; Matthew Mumber; Dugald Seely; Suzanna M Zick; Lindsay M Boyce; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  How are Interactions Taken into Account in Studies on Conventional and Complementary Therapies for Breast Cancer Patients with Menopausal Complaints?

Authors:  J Hübner; K Münstedt; R Mücke; O Micke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Using Chinese version of MYMOP in Chinese medicine evaluation: validity, responsiveness and minimally important change.

Authors:  Vincent C H Chung; Vivian C W Wong; Chun Hong Lau; Henny Hui; Tat Hing Lam; Lin Xiao Zhong; Samuel Y S Wong; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment of hot flashes in cancer.

Authors:  William I Fisher; Aimee K Johnson; Gary R Elkins; Julie L Otte; Debra S Burns; Menggang Yu; Janet S Carpenter
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Classical homeopathy in the treatment of cancer patients--a prospective observational study of two independent cohorts.

Authors:  Matthias Rostock; Johannes Naumann; Corina Guethlin; Lars Guenther; Hans H Bartsch; Harald Walach
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Homeopathy for cancer?

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Outcome related to impact on daily living: preliminary validation of the ORIDL instrument.

Authors:  David Reilly; Stewart W Mercer; Annemieke P Bikker; Tansy Harrison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.