Literature DB >> 15750256

Home blood pressure is a better predictor of carotid atherosclerosis than office blood pressure in community-dwelling subjects.

Rieko Tachibana1, Yasuharu Tabara, Ikuko Kondo, Tetsuro Miki, Katsuhiko Kohara.   

Abstract

An increase in the thickness of the intima-media (IMT) of the carotid artery is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is one of the underlying mechanisms for the progression of carotid atherosclerosis. However, office blood pressure (BP) has been shown to have only a weak association with carotid IMT. Since self-measured home BP has less variation than office BP, home BP could be a better predictor of carotid atherosclerosis. To explore this hypothesis, we compared the relationships between carotid IMT and office BP or home BP in a community-dwelling population. One-hundred and one community residents, aged 50 years or older and not taking any medication, were enrolled in this study. Morning home BP was measured according to the guidelines of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The results were recorded for 2 weeks and averaged. Carotid atherosclerosis was defined as IMT > or =0.80 mm, which corresponds to the first quartile. Home systolic BP showed a more significant association with carotid IMT (r=0.422, p <0.0001) than with office systolic BP (r=0.021, p=0.027). Logistic regression analysis for the presence of carotid atherosclerosis further showed that the relative risk of hypertension defined using home BP (> or =135/85 mmHg) was 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0 to 19.6), while that using office BP was 1.5 (95% CI: 0.5 to 4.2). These results suggest that home BP is a better predictor of the development of carotid atherosclerosis than office BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15750256     DOI: 10.1291/hypres.27.633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  9 in total

1.  Age and the difference between awake ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joji Ishikawa; Yukiko Ishikawa; Donald Edmondson; Thomas G Pickering; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 2.  Is it possible to manage hypertension and evaluate therapy without ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?

Authors:  William B White; Spyridoula Maraka
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Managing hypertension with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  William B White; Vinay Gulati
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Improving Blood Pressure Control Using Digital Communication Methods in Serbia.

Authors:  Nebojsa Tasic; Danijela Tasic; Zorana Kovacevic; Marko Filipovic; Milan Arsic; Sladjana Bozovic-Ogarevic; Biljana Despotovic; Milovan Bojic; Zlatko Maksimovic; Nebojsa Zdravkovic; Sara Mijailovic; Vladimir Zivkovic; Tamara Nikolic Turnic; Vladimir Jakovljevic
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06

5.  Prevalence and factors affecting home blood pressure documentation in routine clinical care: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael H Kramer; Eugene Breydo; Maria Shubina; Kelly Babcock; Jonathan S Einbinder; Alexander Turchin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Home monitoring of blood pressure.

Authors:  Barry P McGrath
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02

7.  What is the optimal interval between successive home blood pressure readings using an automated oscillometric device?

Authors:  Kazuo Eguchi; Sujith Kuruvilla; Gbenga Ogedegbe; William Gerin; Joseph E Schwartz; Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Home blood pressure monitoring: Australian Expert Consensus Statement.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Faline S Howes; Geoffrey A Head; Barry P McGrath; Michael Stowasser; Markus Schlaich; Paul Glasziou; Mark R Nelson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 9.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.