Literature DB >> 15750004

Rapid prenatal diagnostics in the interphase nucleus: procedure and cut-off rates.

Thomas Liehr1, Monika Ziegler.   

Abstract

Results of a rapid prenatal aneuploidy screening in uncultured amniocytes using FISH are available within 24 hr. However, care has to be taken of possible pitfalls in connection with the commercially available probe sets and in the interpretation of results in general. Here we present our cut-off rates for and the way in which we handle the Aneu Vysion kit (ABBOTT/Vysis), based on the experience of 1200 studied cases. In summary, the method is reliable, and the risk for misdiagnosis is low ( approximately 0.4%). Nonetheless, the test should be used exclusively as a preamble to full chromosome analysis by microscopy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15750004     DOI: 10.1369/jhc.4B6394.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  8 in total

1.  Human interphase chromosomes: a review of available molecular cytogenetic technologies.

Authors:  Svetlana G Vorsanova; Yuri B Yurov; Ivan Y Iourov
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Conflicting results of prenatal FISH with different probes for Down's Syndrome critical regions associated with mosaicism for a de novo del(21)(q22) characterised by molecular karyotyping: Case report.

Authors:  Christel Eckmann-Scholz; Stefan Gesk; Inga Nagel; Andrea Haake; Susanne Bens; Simone Heidemann; Monika Kautza; Christian Timke; Reiner Siebert; Almuth Caliebe
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-09-05       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  The importance of rapid aneuploidy screening and prenatal diagnosis in the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Ghada M Elsayed; Lobna El Assiouty; Ezzat S El Sobky
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-29

4.  Somatic mosaicism in cases with small supernumerary marker chromosomes.

Authors:  Thomas Liehr; Tatyana Karamysheva; Martina Merkas; Lukrecija Brecevic; Ahmed B Hamid; Elisabeth Ewers; Kristin Mrasek; Nadezda Kosyakova; Anja Weise
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

5.  Molecular cytogenetic diagnosis and somatic genome variations.

Authors:  S G Vorsanova; Y B Yurov; I V Soloviev; I Y Iourov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 6.  Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) for Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Rearrangement in Lung Cancer: Clinically Relevant Technical Aspects.

Authors:  Zhenya Tang; Lu Wang; Guilin Tang; L Jeffrey Medeiros
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Jinsong Gao; Congcong Liu; Fengxia Yao; Na Hao; Jing Zhou; Qian Zhou; Liang Zhang; Xinyan Liu; Xuming Bian; Juntao Liu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 8.  Cytogenetically visible copy number variations (CG-CNVs) in banding and molecular cytogenetics of human; about heteromorphisms and euchromatic variants.

Authors:  Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.009

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.