Literature DB >> 15749997

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis--an overview.

Caroline Mackie Ogilvie1, Peter R Braude, Paul N Scriven.   

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been expanding in scope and applications. Selection of female embryos to avoid X-linked disease was carried out first by polymerase chain reaction, then by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and an ever-increasing number of tests for monogenic diseases have been developed. Couples with chromosome rearrangements such as Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations form a large referral group for most PGD centers and present a special challenge, due to the large number of genetically unbalanced embryos generated by meiotic segregation. Early protocols used blastomeres biopsied from cleavage-stage embryos; testing of first and second polar bodies is now a routine alternative, and blastocyst biopsy can also be used. More recently, the technology has been harnessed to provide PGD-AS, or aneuploidy screening. FISH probes specific for chromosomes commonly found to be aneuploid in early pregnancy loss are used to test blastomeres for aneuploidy, with the aim of replacing euploid embryos and increasing pregnancy rates in groups of women who have poor IVF success rates. More recent application of PGD to areas such as HLA typing and social sex selection have stoked public controversy and concern, while provoking interesting ethical debates and keeping PGD firmly in the public eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749997     DOI: 10.1369/jhc.4B6395.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  13 in total

1.  Slow and ultrarapid cryopreservation of biopsied mouse blastocysts and its effect on DNA integrity index.

Authors:  Amr Kader; Tommaso Falcone; Rakesh K Sharma; Devna Mangrola; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Therapeutic strategies for the inherited neuropathies.

Authors:  Michael E Shy
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Is human enhancement also a personal matter?

Authors:  Vincent Menuz; Thierry Hurlimann; Béatrice Godard
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Views of internists towards uses of PGD.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder; Anita Shanmugham; Lisa J Chin; Meredith Stark; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Benefits and drawbacks of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations: lessons from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven; Frances A Flinter; Yakoub Khalaf; Alison Lashwood; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  Views of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among psychiatrists and neurologists.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Kristopher J Abbate; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Lindsey M King; Cheryl A Miree; Sue Friedman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Genetics for the ophthalmologist.

Authors:  Karthikeyan A Sadagopan; Jenina Capasso; Alex V Levin
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09

10.  Pre-pregnancy cytogenetic analysis of general couples in eastern China.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Hexi Wang; Min Gao; Shuangshan Xu; Xiaofen Xu; Xinyu Cao; Ying Tao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.