Literature DB >> 15749665

The impact of the combination of baseline risk group and cytogenetic response on the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alpha.

Joerg Hasford1, Markus Pfirrmann, Pat Shepherd, Joëlle Guilhot, Rüdiger Hehlmann, François-Xavier Mahon, Hanneke C Kluin-Nelemans, Kazunori Ohnishi, Juan Luis Steegmann, Josef Thaler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed at examining major cytogenetic response (MCR) as a valid predictor of the course of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and at assessing the survival of CML patients treated with interferon alpha (IFN) in dependence on the combination of MCR (yes or no) with the baseline risk group of the New CML score. MCR was defined as a reduction of Philadelphia chromosome-positive bone marrow cells to <or= 35%. The New CML score discriminated three risk groups with significantly different survival probabilities. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from individual patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML treated with IFN were collected from 10 prospective studies in Europe and Japan. Stratified for baseline risk group, patients with a major cytogenetic response by 21 months after the start of therapy (n=171) were compared with patients achieving a minor response or less (n=487). Survival probabilities after the landmark at 21 months were compared by using the two-sided log-rank test.
RESULTS: MCR was a major predictor for low- and intermediate-risk patients (log-rank test, p <or= 0.0001), but not for high-risk patients. Ten-year survival probabilities for the low- and intermediate-risk patients who had a MCR were 75% (95 CI: 65-86%) and 56% (95 CI: 37-75%), respectively. The corresponding probabilities for patients who did not achieve a MCR were 21% (95 CI: 6-35%) and 16% (95 CI: 6-25%). INTERPRETATION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Cytogenetic response per se is not a valid surrogate marker, as it is dependent on the baseline prognostic profile. The combination of risk group and cytogenetic response does, however, provide useful clinical information. The survival data presented here can serve as a benchmark for the assessment of the long-term effectiveness of imatinib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  3 in total

1.  Failure to achieve a major cytogenetic response by 12 months defines inadequate response in patients receiving nilotinib or dasatinib as second or subsequent line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Constantine S Tam; Hagop Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Gautam Borthakur; Susan O'Brien; Farhad Ravandi; Jenny Shan; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The Hasford Score May Predict Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  Jarosław Dybko; Bożena Jaźwiec; Olga Haus; Donata Urbaniak-Kujda; Katarzyna Kapelko-Słowik; Tomasz Wróbel; Tomasz Lonc; Mateusz Sawicki; Ewa Mędraś; Agnieszka Kaczmar-Dybko; Kazimierz Kuliczkowski
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  Switching to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor improves the response and outcome of frontline imatinib-treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with more than 10% of BCR-ABL/ABL ratio at 3 months.

Authors:  Luis-Felipe Casado; José-Valentín García-Gutiérrez; Isabel Massagué; Pilar Giraldo; Manuel Pérez-Encinas; Raquel de Paz; Joaquín Martínez-López; Guiomar Bautista; Santiago Osorio; María-José Requena; Luis Palomera; María-Jesús Peñarrubia; Carmen Calle; José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas; Carmen Burgaleta; Begoña Maestro; Nuria García-Ormeña; Juan-Luis Steegmann
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.