Literature DB >> 15749031

Recurrent carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy: natural history and risk factors.

T Reina-Gutiérrez1, F J Serrano-Hernando, L Sánchez-Hervás, A Ponce, M Vega de Ceniga, A Martín.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish the incidence of restenosis (RES) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and evaluate clinical and technical factors related to its development.
DESIGN: Prospective non-randomised cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-four patients with 243 CEA between May 1998 and December 2002, were subjected to clinical and haemodynamic follow-up, median follow-up 23 months (1-56). There was selective use of a shunt (17.3%) and patch (61.7%). RES (> or =50%) and severe restenosis, > or =70%, (sRES) were defined as peak systolic velocities of > or =150 and > or =300cm/s (or > or =250cm/s with diastolic velocity >100cm/s), respectively. Rates of RES, symptom development and mortality were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox's regression model (hazards ratio/95% CI) was used to evaluate prognostic factors.
RESULTS: We detected 13 sRES (5.3%) (median time 6.1 months) and 30 (12.3%) moderate stenosis (mRES) (median time 3.7 months). Cumulative freedom from sRES at 23 months was 94.2%. Five sRES detected in the first 45 days after the procedure were deemed to be residual restenosis (rRES). Five (38.4%) sRES were symptomatic, 15.3% progressed to occlusion. Patient survival was 98.0 and 96.4% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Independent risk factors for sRES: female sex (HR: 3.3, 95% CI 1.1-10 p=0.04) and diabetes (HR: 4.5, 95% CI 1.4-13.9 p=0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid restenosis appears early, is usually low-grade and mostly asymptomatic. Although few stenoses progress to occlusion, women and diabetic patients were at highest risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749031     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  4 in total

1.  The value and economic analysis of routine postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Mohit Srivastava; Zachary AbuRahma; Will Jackson; Albeir Mousa; Patrick A Stone; L Scott Dean; Jason Green
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Effect of patching on reducing restenosis in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Mahmoud Malas; Natalia O Glebova; Susan E Hughes; Jenifer H Voeks; Umair Qazi; Wesley S Moore; Brajesh K Lal; George Howard; Rafael Llinas; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  A Single-center Retrospective Study with 5- and 10-year Follow-up of Carotid Endarterectomy with Patch Graft.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Okazaki; Yasuhisa Kanematsu; Kenji Shimada; Masaaki Korai; Junichiro Satomi; Masaaki Uno; Shinji Nagahiro; Yasushi Takagi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Do standard carotid artery endarterectomy and primary closure technique cause early restenosis in diabetic patients?

Authors:  Eyup Murat Kanber; Murat Ugurlucan; Mazlum Sahin; Devrim Saribal; Ufuk Alpagut
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2017-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.