Literature DB >> 15748984

Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural populations for pseudohyphal growth and colony morphology.

Enrico Casalone1, Claudia Barberio, Lorenzo Cappellini, Mario Polsinelli.   

Abstract

In this work we have analyzed the colony and cellular morphologies of natural populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in response to different environmental stimuli. Among one thousand strains grown on YPD medium, 2.5% exhibited a rough (R) colony phenotype versus a smooth (S) phenotype. When grown on the ammonium-deficient medium SLAD, 56% of the strains showed a filamentous phenotype, often associated (43.8%) with an invasive phenotype, while 4.7% of the strains exhibited only an invasive phenotype. The rough phenotype on YPD was always associated with the filamentous phenotype on SLAD. A subset of 52 strains was further characterized for the growth phenotype under different stimuli (nitrogen deprivation, addition of alcohols, growth on proline as sole nitrogen source). On 27 strains, genetic analysis of the spore products was also performed. The entire set of data showed a wide distribution of dimorphism in the yeast population and great variability with respect to the dimorphic switch capability. Some strains grew with peculiar colony morphologies under different environmental stimuli and some showed colony morphology variations. Ecological implications of the wide spreading of dimorphic behavior and the occurrence of peculiar colony morphologies in natural yeasts are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15748984     DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Microbiol        ISSN: 0923-2508            Impact factor:   3.992


  12 in total

1.  Heritable remodeling of yeast multicellularity by an environmentally responsive prion.

Authors:  Daniel L Holmes; Alex K Lancaster; Susan Lindquist; Randal Halfmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  The regulation of filamentous growth in yeast.

Authors:  Paul J Cullen; George F Sprague
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Determination of MICING: a new assay for assessing minimal inhibitory concentration for invasive growth.

Authors:  J Zupan; Z Tomičić; P Raspor
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Quantifying the dominant growth mechanisms of dimorphic yeast using a lattice-based model.

Authors:  Hayden Tronnolone; Jennifer M Gardner; Joanna F Sundstrom; Vladimir Jiranek; Stephen G Oliver; Benjamin J Binder
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Cell Biology: Marine Yeasts Deepen the Sea of Diversity.

Authors:  Corey A H Allard; James B Moseley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Natural variation in CDC28 underlies morphological phenotypes in an environmental yeast isolate.

Authors:  Hana N Lee; Paul M Magwene; Rachel B Brem
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Colony density influences invasive and filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Lucaccioni; G Morpurgo; A Achilli; C Barberio; E Casalone; N Babudri
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts exhibiting rough colonies and pseudohyphal morphology with respect to alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  Vanda Renata Reis; Ana Paula Guarnieri Bassi; Jessica Carolina Gomes da Silva; Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.476

9.  Similar environments but diverse fates: Responses of budding yeast to nutrient deprivation.

Authors:  Saul M Honigberg
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2016-08

10.  Comparison of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains of clinical and nonclinical origin by molecular typing and determination of putative virulence traits.

Authors:  Trine Danø Klingberg; Urska Lesnik; Nils Arneborg; Peter Raspor; Lene Jespersen
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.