Literature DB >> 15748177

Module three: vulnerable/special participant populations.

Jason P Lott1.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT This module is designed to sensitise you to the special needs of participants who belong to populations that are more vulnerable than other participant populations. These populations typically include incompetent persons women who may or may not be pregnant, children, prisoners and refugees, impoverished people, and ethnic minorities. These and similar groups deserve special consideration for a number of important ethical and historical reasons, specifically those that surround the potential for exploitation, problems with informed consent, and concerns about respect for participant autonomy. This module introduces modus operandi that are based on national and international research guidelines for dealing with vulnerable/special participant populations, offering contextually-dependent advice and relevant ethical considerations/arguments for and against their involvement in scientific research endeavours.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15748177     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2005.00101.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  5 in total

1.  Ethical considerations for conducting health disparities research in community health centers: a social-ecological perspective.

Authors:  Carla Boutin-Foster; Ebony Scott; Jennifer Melendez; Anna Rodriguez; Rosio Ramos; Balavenkatesh Kanna; Walid Michelen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Ethical issues in research involving minority populations: the process and outcomes of protocol review by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Authors:  Pornpimon Adams; Waranya Wongwit; Krisana Pengsaa; Srisin Khusmith; Wijitr Fungladda; Warissara Chaiyaphan; Chanthima Limphattharacharoen; Sukanya Prakobtham; Jaranit Kaewkungwal
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on 'evidence biased' medicine.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  An investigation into the association of pre- and post-migration experiences on the self-rated health status among new resettled adult humanitarian refugees to Australia: a protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Alison Dowling; Joanne Enticott; Marina Kunin; Grant Russell
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2019-04-30

5.  Challenges for consent and community engagement in the conduct of cluster randomized trial among school children in low income settings: experiences from Kenya.

Authors:  George Okello; Caroline Jones; Maureen Bonareri; Sarah N Ndegwa; Carlos McHaro; Juddy Kengo; Kevin Kinyua; Margaret M Dubeck; Katherine E Halliday; Matthew C H Jukes; Sassy Molyneux; Simon J Brooker
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.