Literature DB >> 15747822

Fracture strength of ceramic bracket tie wings subjected to tension.

Gerald Johnson1, Mary P Walker, Katherine Kula.   

Abstract

One of the most common areas of ceramic bracket fracture is within the tie-wing complex. When an archwire is ligated into position, tensile forces are placed under the tie wing. However, no study, to date, has focused specifically on the fracture resistance of the tie-wing complex. The aim of this study is to compare the tensile fracture strength of seven currently available ceramic brackets (Inspire, Fascination, Mystique, InVu, Clarity, Virage, and Luxi) as a function of bracket brand and bracket configuration, semitwin vs true-twin. Based on a power analysis of pilot data, 10 maxillary central incisor brackets per group were tested to failure with a tensile load placed directly under the distoincisal tie wing. The results ranged from a maximum mean fracture strength of 147.71 (5.87) MPa with Fascination brackets to a minimum mean fracture strength of 84.28 (7.01) MPa with Luxi brackets. The statistical analysis indicated a significant effect on fracture strength as a function of bracket brand (P < .05) and that semitwin brackets, Fascination, Mystique, and Virage, had significantly higher fracture strength than true-twin brackets, Clarity, lnVu, and Luxi (P < .05). Interestingly, the only monocrystalline bracket in the study, Inspire, could not be fractured using the investigation protocol. In fact, the steel ligature fixture wire would break before tie-wing fracture at a mean fixture failure of 198.65 MPa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15747822     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0095:FSOCBT>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  6 in total

1.  Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Istabrak Hasan; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of the Debonding Characteristics of Conventional and New Debonding Instrument used for Ceramic, Composite and Metallic Brackets - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Garima Choudhary; Vikas Gill; Y N N Reddy; Sudhanshu Sanadhya; Pankaj Aapaliya; Nidhi Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

3.  Torque differences due to the material variation of the orthodontic appliance: a finite element study.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic; Theodore Eliades; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.750

4.  Effects of self-ligating brackets and other factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Georgios Polychronis; Nearchos Panayi; Spiros Zinelis; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.247

6.  Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Murilo Matias; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Guilherme Janson; Rodrigo Hitoshi Higa; Manoela Fávaro Francisconi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.