Literature DB >> 15746778

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is more profitable than open repair based on contribution margin per day.

Barry L Rosenberg1, Matthew C Comstock, David A Butz, Paul A Taheri, David M Williams, Gilbert R Upchurch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have reported that endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EAAA) repair yields lower total profit margins than open AAA (OAAA) repair. This study compared EAAA versus OAAA based on contribution margin per day, which may better measure profitability of new clinical technologies. Contribution margin equals revenue less variable direct costs (VDCs). VDCs capture incremental resources tied directly to individual patients' activity (eg, invoice price of endograft device, nursing labor). Overhead costs factor into total margin, but not contribution margin.
METHODS: The University of Michigan Health System's cost accounting system was used to extract fiscal year 2002-2003 information on revenue, total margin, contribution margin, and duration of stay for Medicare patients with principal diagnosis of AAA (ICD-9 code 441.4).
RESULTS: OAAA had revenues of $37,137 per case versus $28,960 for EAAA, similar VDCs per case, and thus higher contribution margin per case ($24,404 for OAAA vs $13,911 for EAAA, P < .001). However, OAAA had significantly longer mean duration of stay per case (10.2 days vs 2.2 days, P < .001). Therefore, mean contribution margin per day was $2948 for OAAA, but $8569 for EAAA ( P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of contribution margin per day, EAAA repair dominates OAAA repair. The shorter duration of stay with EAAA allows higher throughput, fuller overhead amortization, better use of scarce inpatient beds, and higher health system profits. Surgeons must understand overhead allocation to devices, especially when new technologies cut duration of stay markedly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15746778     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  Cost disparity between open repair and endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-institute experience in Japan.

Authors:  Hirofumi Morimae; Takashi Maekawa; Hiroaki Tamai; Noriko Takahashi; Tsutomu Ihara; Akihiko Hori; Hiroshi Narita; Hiroshi Banno; Masayoshi Kobayashi; Kiyohito Yamamoto; Kimihiro Komori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  [Hybrid operating rooms versus conventional operating rooms : Economic comparisons in vascular surgery using the example of endovascular aneurysm repair].

Authors:  N Attigah; S Demirel; M Hakimi; H Bruijnen; O Schöffski; A Müller; U Geis; D Böckler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: state of the art.

Authors:  Jonathan L Eliason; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-04

4.  Does perioperative respiratory event increase length of hospital stay and hospital cost in pediatric ambulatory surgery?

Authors:  Maliwan Oofuvong; Alan Frederick Geater; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong; Thavat Chanchayanon; Bussarin Sriyanaluk; Boonthida Suwanrat; Kanjana Nuanjun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  ICD-10 procedure codes produce transition challenges.

Authors:  Andrew D Boyd; Jianrong 'John' Li; Colleen Kenost; Samir Rachid Zaim; Jacob Krive; Manish Mittal; Richard A Satava; Michael Burton; Jacob Smith; Yves A Lussier
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 6.  Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR.

Authors:  Robert Hopkins; James Bowen; Kaitryn Campbell; Gord Blackhouse; Guy De Rose; Teresa Novick; Daria O'Reilly; Ron Goeree; Jean-Eric Tarride
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.