Literature DB >> 15746685

Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.

Gernot Hudelist1, Janos Gelle'n, Christian Singer, Ernst Ruecklinger, Klaus Czerwenka, Othmar Kandolf, Joerg Keckstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anal sphincter injury and its sequelae are a recognized complication of vaginal childbirth. The aim of the present study was to identify risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal tears in patients undergoing either spontaneous or vaginal-assisted delivery by forceps routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. STUDY
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 5377 vaginal deliveries based on the analysis of the obstetric database and patient records of our department during a 5-year period from 1999 to 2003. Cases and control subjects were chosen randomly and patients' records were reviewed for the following variables: maternal age, parity, gestational age, tobacco use, gestational diabetes or pregnancy-induced hypertension, use of peridural anesthesia, duration of first and second stages of labor, use of mediolateral episiotomy, forceps combined with mediolateral episiotomy, induction of labor, infant head diameter, shoulder circumference, and birth weight.
RESULTS: Of 5044 spontaneous vaginal deliveries 32 (0.6%) and of 333 assisted vaginal deliveries 14 (4.2%) patients sustained a perineal defect involving the external sphincter. An univariate analysis of these 46 cases and 155 randomly selected control subjects showed that low parity (P = .003; Mann-Whitney U test), prolonged first and second stages of labor (P = .001, P = .001), high birth weight (P = .031), episiotomy (P = .004; Fisher exact test), and forceps delivery (P = .002) increased the risk for sphincter damage. In multivariate regression models, only high birth weight (P = .004; odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 1.18-2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]), and forceps delivery combined with mediolateral episiotomies (P < .001; OR 5.62, 2.16-14.62, 95% CI) proved to be independent risk factors. There was a statistical significant interaction of birth weight and head circumference (P = .012; OR 0.99, 0.98-0.99, 95% CI). Although the use of episiotomy conferred an increased risk toward a higher likelihood of severe perineal trauma, it did not reach statistical significance (P = .06; OR 2.15, 0.97-4.76, 95% CI).
CONCLUSIONS: In consistence with previous reports, women who are vaginally delivered of a large infant are at a high risk for sphincter damage. Although the rate of these complications was surprisingly low in vaginally assisted childbirth, the use of forceps, even if routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy, should be minimized whenever possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15746685     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

1.  Diabetes and pregnancy: beyond glucose?

Authors:  C Mathieu
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Rectovaginal fistulas: current surgical management.

Authors:  David E Rivadeneira; Brett Ruffo; Salim Amrani; Cynthia Salinas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

3.  Repair of a recurrent rectovaginal fistula with a biological graft.

Authors:  Kate Berger; Jonathan Faro; Sebastian Faro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primiparous women.

Authors:  Peter Baumann; Ahmad O Hammoud; Samuel Gene McNeeley; Elizabeth DeRose; Bela Kudish; Susan Hendrix
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-09

5.  Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Shiliang Liu; Yasser Sabr; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Olof Stephansson; Neda Razaz; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Alternative model of birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perineal trauma.

Authors:  Carolina Walker; Tania Rodríguez; Ana Herranz; José A Espinosa; Emília Sánchez; Montserrat Espuña-Pons
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?

Authors:  Yuval Lavy; Peter K Sand; Chava I Kaniel; Drorith Hochner-Celnikier
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Effect of vaginal delivery on anal sphincter function in Asian primigravida: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dakshitha Praneeth Wickramasinghe; Supun Senaratne; Hemantha Senanayake; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal delivery of twins: associated risk factors and comparison with singletons.

Authors:  Shay Porat; David Baud; Dan Farine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Severe primary postpartum hemorrhage due to genital tract laceration after operative vaginal delivery: successful treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization.

Authors:  Yann Fargeaudou; Philippe Soyer; Olivier Morel; Marc Sirol; Olivier le Dref; Mourad Boudiaf; Henri Dahan; Roland Rymer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.