Literature DB >> 15746680

Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight.

Qiuying Yang1, Shi Wu Wen, Yue Chen, Daniel Krewski, Karen Fung Kee Fung, Mark Walker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to the mode of delivery and birth weight. STUDY
DESIGN: Data from a retrospective cohort study that was based on all twin births in the United States (1995-1997) were used.
RESULTS: A total of 15,185 vertex-nonvertex second twins were classified into 3 groups: (1) both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery (37.7%), (2) both twins were delivered vaginally (46.8%), and (3) the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after vaginal delivery of the first twin (15.5%). The risk of asphyxia-related neonatal deaths and morbidity was increased in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery. The increase in neonatal death in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally was stronger in the birth weight of < 1500 g. In contrast, in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after the first twin was delivered vaginally, the increase in neonatal morbidity was greater in the group in which the birth weight was 1500 to 4000 g.
CONCLUSION: The risk of neonatal death and morbidity in second-born twins is higher in the group in which both twins were delivered vaginally and the group in which the second twin was delivered by cesarean delivery after the first twin was delivered vaginally compared with the group in which both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15746680     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations.

Authors:  Diane Christopher; Barrett K Robinson; Alan M Peaceman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

2.  Cesarean delivery for the second twin.

Authors:  James M Alexander; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight Rouse; Mark B Landon; Sharon A Gilbert; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Outcome of twin pregnancies conceived after assisted reproductive techniques.

Authors:  Baxi A; Kaushal M
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2008-01

4.  The effects of labor and delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in term twins: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  D J Wenckus; W Gao; M A Kominiarek; I Wilkins
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Kate M Fleming; Ian R White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-02

Review 6.  What is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm cephalic/non-cephalic twin pairs? A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Catherine Dagenais; Anne-Mary Lewis-Mikhael; Marinela Grabovac; Amit Mukerji; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Growth patterns and associated risk factors of congenital malformations in twins.

Authors:  Ettore Piro; Ingrid Anne Mandy Schierz; Gregorio Serra; Giuseppe Puccio; Mario Giuffrè; Giovanni Corsello
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.