PURPOSE: Describe and compare the central nervous system pharmacology of the platinum analogues, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin and develop a pharmacokinetic model to distinguish the disposition of active drug from inert platinum species. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Oxaliplatin (7 or 5 mg/kg), cisplatin (2 mg/kg), or carboplatin (10 mg/kg) was given i.v. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected over 24 hours. Plasma ultrafiltrates were prepared immediately. Platinum concentrations were measured using atomic absorption spectrometry. Areas under the concentration x time curve were derived using the linear trapezoidal method. CSF penetration was defined as the CSF AUC(0-24)/plasma ultrafiltrate AUC(0-24) ratio. A four-compartment model with first-order rate constants was fit to the data to distinguish active drug from inactive metabolites. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD AUCs in plasma ultrafiltrate for oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin were 61 +/- 22, 18 +/- 6, and 211 +/- 64 micromol/L hour, respectively. The AUCs in CSF were 1.2 +/- 0.4 micromol/L hour for oxaliplatin, 0.56 +/- 0.08 micromol/L hour for cisplatin, and 8 +/- 2.2 mumol/L hour for carboplatin, and CSF penetration was 2.0%, 3.6%, and 3.8%, respectively. For oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin, the pharmacokinetic model estimated that active drug accounted for 29%, 79%, and 81% of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate, respectively, and 25%, 89%, and 56% of platinum in CSF, respectively. The CSF penetration of active drug was 1.6% for oxaliplatin, 3.7% for cisplatin, and 2.6% for carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: The CSF penetration of the platinum analogues is limited. The pharmacokinetic model distinguished between active drug and their inactive (inert) metabolites in plasma and CSF.
PURPOSE: Describe and compare the central nervous system pharmacology of the platinum analogues, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin and develop a pharmacokinetic model to distinguish the disposition of active drug from inert platinum species. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Oxaliplatin (7 or 5 mg/kg), cisplatin (2 mg/kg), or carboplatin (10 mg/kg) was given i.v. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected over 24 hours. Plasma ultrafiltrates were prepared immediately. Platinum concentrations were measured using atomic absorption spectrometry. Areas under the concentration x time curve were derived using the linear trapezoidal method. CSF penetration was defined as the CSF AUC(0-24)/plasma ultrafiltrate AUC(0-24) ratio. A four-compartment model with first-order rate constants was fit to the data to distinguish active drug from inactive metabolites. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD AUCs in plasma ultrafiltrate for oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin were 61 +/- 22, 18 +/- 6, and 211 +/- 64 micromol/L hour, respectively. The AUCs in CSF were 1.2 +/- 0.4 micromol/L hour for oxaliplatin, 0.56 +/- 0.08 micromol/L hour for cisplatin, and 8 +/- 2.2 mumol/L hour for carboplatin, and CSF penetration was 2.0%, 3.6%, and 3.8%, respectively. For oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin, the pharmacokinetic model estimated that active drug accounted for 29%, 79%, and 81% of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate, respectively, and 25%, 89%, and 56% of platinum in CSF, respectively. The CSF penetration of active drug was 1.6% for oxaliplatin, 3.7% for cisplatin, and 2.6% for carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: The CSF penetration of the platinum analogues is limited. The pharmacokinetic model distinguished between active drug and their inactive (inert) metabolites in plasma and CSF.
Authors: Regina I Jakacki; Peter C Burger; Tianni Zhou; Emiko J Holmes; Mehmet Kocak; Arzu Onar; Joel Goldwein; Minesh Mehta; Roger J Packer; Nancy Tarbell; Charles Fitz; Gilbert Vezina; Joanne Hilden; Ian F Pollack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Julie L Eiseman; Jan H Beumer; Lora H Rigatti; Sandra Strychor; Kelly Meyers; Samuel Dienel; Charles C Horn Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Leigh Marcus; Robert Murphy; Elizabeth Fox; Cynthia McCully; Raphael Cruz; Katherine E Warren; Thorsten Meyer; Edward McNiff; Frank M Balis; Brigitte C Widemann Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-06-26 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Paul T Henderson; Tao Li; Miaoling He; Hongyong Zhang; Michael Malfatti; David Gandara; Peter P Grimminger; Kathleen D Danenberg; Laurel Beckett; Ralph W de Vere White; Kenneth W Turteltaub; Chong-Xian Pan Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Shana Jacobs; Cynthia L McCully; Robert F Murphy; John Bacher; Frank M Balis; Elizabeth Fox Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 3.333