AIM: Recurrent ovarian cancer is a major problem and an accurate diagnosis can often change patients' management. This study aimed to assess the impact on management of FDG-PET in recurrent ovarian cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-three patients in whom FDG-PET scan was performed due to suspected recurrent ovarian cancer were included. FDG-PET results were confirmed by histopathology and clinical follow-up of at least 12 months. To assess impact on management the treatment plan based on conventional imaging methods was compared with the treatment plan based on inclusion of PET findings, classifying FDG-PET impact on management as high, medium, low or no impact. Management changes, when present, were classified as intermodality or intramodality. RESULTS: FDG-PET had a high impact on therapeutic management in 28 patients (65.1 %), medium impact in 2 patients (4.6 %), low impact in 9 patients (20.9 %), and no impact in 4 patients (9.3 %). FDG-PET induced an intermodality change in management in 27 patients (62,8 %); intramodality changes were induced in 3 patients (7 %). Finally, it produced no treatment changes in 13 patients (30.2 %). CONCLUSION: FDG-PET supplied additional information when compared to conventional diagnostic procedures and allowed adequate management changes in most patients.
AIM: Recurrent ovarian cancer is a major problem and an accurate diagnosis can often change patients' management. This study aimed to assess the impact on management of FDG-PET in recurrent ovarian cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-three patients in whom FDG-PET scan was performed due to suspected recurrent ovarian cancer were included. FDG-PET results were confirmed by histopathology and clinical follow-up of at least 12 months. To assess impact on management the treatment plan based on conventional imaging methods was compared with the treatment plan based on inclusion of PET findings, classifying FDG-PET impact on management as high, medium, low or no impact. Management changes, when present, were classified as intermodality or intramodality. RESULTS:FDG-PET had a high impact on therapeutic management in 28 patients (65.1 %), medium impact in 2 patients (4.6 %), low impact in 9 patients (20.9 %), and no impact in 4 patients (9.3 %). FDG-PET induced an intermodality change in management in 27 patients (62,8 %); intramodality changes were induced in 3 patients (7 %). Finally, it produced no treatment changes in 13 patients (30.2 %). CONCLUSION:FDG-PET supplied additional information when compared to conventional diagnostic procedures and allowed adequate management changes in most patients.
Authors: G Mangili; M Picchio; S Sironi; R Viganò; E Rabaiotti; D Bornaghi; V Bettinardi; C Crivellaro; C Messa; F Fazio Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Nicolas Aide; Patrick M Colletti; Annamaria Ferrero; Diana Paez; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-07-03 Impact factor: 9.236