Literature DB >> 1574550

Diagnostic disclosure: a tale in two cultures.

P McDonald-Scott1, S Machizawa, H Satoh.   

Abstract

Diagnostic communication between doctors and patients is thought to differ radically between Japan and Western countries. To understand diagnostic disclosure to psychiatric patients, a questionnaire with six case vignettes was sent to practising psychiatrists in Japan (N = 166) and North America (N = 112). While over 90% of both groups would inform patients with affective and anxiety disorders of their diagnoses, only 70% of North Americans and less than 30% of Japanese would similarly inform patients with schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorders. The Japanese preferred alternative was to give a vague alternative diagnosis such as neurasthenia. North Americans would discuss differential diagnoses with the patient instead. Nearly all in both groups would inform the family, but North Americans would do so only with patient consent. For disorders for which there are effective treatments, diagnostic disclosure is common to both cultures; when prognosis is uncertain or the diagnosis is feared, as in schizophrenia, culturally constructed views of patienthood govern disclosure practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1574550     DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700032803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  8 in total

1.  An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices.

Authors:  A C Milton; B Mullan; C MacCann; C Hunt
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 2.  Diagnosing borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Robert S Biskin; Joel Paris
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A comparative study of diagnostic practice in psychiatry in Northern Norway and Northwest Russia.

Authors:  Grigory Rezvyy; Terje Oiesvold; Alexandr Parniakov; Reidun Olstad
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Standardized "malhotra-wig vignettes" for research in India : a review with full text.

Authors:  H K Malhotra; N N Wig
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Information giving challenges and support strategies at the time of a mental health diagnosis: qualitative views from Australian health professionals.

Authors:  Alyssa C Milton; Barbara Mullan; Caroline Hunt
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Public beliefs about treatment and outcome of mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan.

Authors:  Anthony F Jorm; Yoshibumi Nakane; Helen Christensen; Kumiko Yoshioka; Kathleen M Griffiths; Yuji Wata
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2005-07-09       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Assessment of psychiatrists' approaches regarding disclosure of psychiatric disorders to their patients: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anahita Amidi Naeini; Hadi Ranjbar; Homa Mohammadsadeghi; Kaveh Alavi; Hamidreza Ahmadkhaniha; Maryam Rasoulian
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-07-20

8.  Low level of knowledge regarding diagnosis and treatment among inpatients with schizophrenia in Shanghai.

Authors:  Jingjing Huang; Andrea Chiovenda; Yang Shao; Huajian Ma; Huafang Li; Mary-Jo DelVecchio Good
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.570

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.