Literature DB >> 15745135

Precise quantification of pressure flow waveforms of a pulsatile ventricular assist device.

Akif Undar1, Conrad M Zapanta, John D Reibson, Matthew Souba, Branka Lukic, William J Weiss, Alan J Snyder, Allen R Kunselman, William S Pierce, Gerson Rosenberg, John L Myers.   

Abstract

Unreliable quantification of flow pulsatility has hampered many efforts to assess the importance of pulsatile perfusion. Generation of pulsatile flow depends upon an energy gradient. It is necessary to quantify pressure flow waveforms in terms of hemodynamic energy levels to make a valid comparison between perfusion modes during chronic support. The objective of this study was to quantify pressure flow waveforms in terms of energy equivalent pressure (EEP) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) levels in an adult mock loop using a pulsatile ventricle assist system (VAD). A 70 cc Pierce-Donachy pneumatic pulsatile VAD was used with a Penn State adult mock loop. The pump flow rate was kept constant at 5 L/min with pump rates of 70 and 80 bpm and mean aortic pressures (MAP) of 80, 90, and 100 mm Hg, respectively. Pump flows were adjusted by varying the systolic pressure, systolic duration, and the diastolic vacuum of the pneumatic drive unit. The aortic pressure was adjusted by varying the systemic resistance of the mock loop EEP (mm Hg) = (integral of fpdf)/(integral of fdt) SHE (ergs/cm3) = 1,332 [((integral of fpdt)/(integral of fdt))--MAP] were calculated at each experimental stage. The difference between the EEP and the MAP is the extra energy generated by this device. This difference is approximately 10% in a normal human heart. The EEP levels were 88.3 +/- 0.9 mm Hg, 98.1 +/- 1.3 mm Hg, and 107.4 +/- 1.0 mm Hg with a pump rate of 70 bpm and an aortic pressure of 80 mm Hg, 90 mm Hg, and 100 mm Hg, respectively. Surplus hemodynamic energy in terms of ergs/cm3 was 11,039 +/- 1,236 ergs/cm3, 10,839 +/- 1,659 ergs/cm3, and 9,857 +/- 1,289 ergs/cm3, respectively. The percentage change from the mean aortic pressure to EEP was 10.4 +/- 1.2%, 9.0 +/- 1.4%, and 7.4 +/- 1.0% at the same experimental stages. Similar results were obtained when the pump rate was changed from 70 bpm to 80 bpm. The EEP and SHE formulas are adequate to quantify different levels of pulsatility for direct and meaningful comparisons. This particular pulsatile VAD system produces near physiologic hemodynamic energy levels at each experimental stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15745135     DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000150326.51377.a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  9 in total

1.  A new flow co-culture system for studying mechanobiology effects of pulse flow waves.

Authors:  Devon Scott-Drechsel; Zhenbi Su; Kendall Hunter; Min Li; Robin Shandas; Wei Tan
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Changing pulsatility by delaying the rotational speed phasing of a rotary left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Kazuma Date; Takashi Nishimura; Mamoru Arakawa; Yoshiaki Takewa; Satoru Kishimoto; Akihide Umeki; Masahiko Ando; Toshihide Mizuno; Tomonori Tsukiya; Minoru Ono; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Asynchronous Pumping of a Pulsatile Ventricular Assist Device in a Pediatric Anastomosis Model.

Authors:  Bryan C Good; William J Weiss; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2017-07

4.  PediaFlow™ Maglev Ventricular Assist Device: A Prescriptive Design Approach.

Authors:  James F Antaki; Michael R Ricci; Josiah E Verkaik; Shaun T Snyder; Timothy M Maul; Jeongho Kim; Dave B Paden; Marina V Kameneva; Bradley E Paden; Peter D Wearden; Harvey S Borovetz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Generating pulsatility by pump speed modulation with continuous-flow total artificial heart in awake calves.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Jamshid H Karimov; Gengo Sunagawa; David J Horvath; Nicole Byram; Barry D Kuban; Raymond Dessoffy; Shiva Sale; Leonard A R Golding; Nader Moazami
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Mechanics and Function of the Pulmonary Vasculature: Implications for Pulmonary Vascular Disease and Right Ventricular Function.

Authors:  Steven Lammers; Devon Scott; Kendall Hunter; Wei Tan; Robin Shandas; Kurt R Stenmark
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  High pulsatility flow induces adhesion molecule and cytokine mRNA expression in distal pulmonary artery endothelial cells.

Authors:  Min Li; Devon E Scott; Robin Shandas; Kurt R Stenmark; Wei Tan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  High Pulsatility Flow Induces Acute Endothelial Inflammation through Overpolarizing Cells to Activate NF-κB.

Authors:  Min Li; Yan Tan; Kurt R Stenmark; Wei Tan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 9.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Heart Failure: Are We about to Witness a New "Gold Standard"?

Authors:  Massimo Capoccia
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2016-12-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.