BACKGROUND: Age-related cataract accounts for more than 40% of cases of blindness in the world with the majority of people who are blind from cataract found in the developing world. With the increased number of people with cataract there is an urgent need for cataract surgery to be made available as a day care procedure. OBJECTIVES: To provide reliable evidence regarding the safety, feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cataract extraction performed as day care versus in-patient procedure. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), EMBASE (1980 to August 2004) and LILACS (July 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: This review includes randomised controlled trials comparing day care and in-patient surgery for age-related cataract. The primary outcome was the achievement of a satisfactory visual acuity six weeks after the operation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Although two trials are included in the review, adequate data were available for only one trial and therefore pooling of data from studies was not attempted. A descriptive summary is presented. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials, involving a total of 1284 people, are included in this review. One trial reported statistically significant differences in early postoperative complication rates in the day care group, with an increased risk of increased intraocular pressure, which had no clinical relevance to visual outcomes four months postoperatively. The mean change in visual acuity (Snellen lines) of the operated eye four months postoperatively was 4.1 (standard deviation (SD) 2.3) for the day care group and 4.1 (SD 2.2) for the in-patient group and not statistically significant. The four-month postoperative mean change in quality of life score measured using the VF14 showed minimal differences between the two groups. Costs were 20% more for the in-patient group and this was attributed to higher costs for overnight stay. One study only reported hotel costs for the non-hospitalised participants making aggregation of data on costs impossible. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides some evidence that there is a cost saving but no significant difference in outcome or risk of postoperative complications between day care and in-patient cataract surgery. This is based on one detailed and methodologically sound trial conducted in the developed world. The success, safety and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery as a day care procedure appear to be acceptable but additional well-designed trials are required to confirm these perceptions.
BACKGROUND: Age-related cataract accounts for more than 40% of cases of blindness in the world with the majority of people who are blind from cataract found in the developing world. With the increased number of people with cataract there is an urgent need for cataract surgery to be made available as a day care procedure. OBJECTIVES: To provide reliable evidence regarding the safety, feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cataract extraction performed as day care versus in-patient procedure. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), EMBASE (1980 to August 2004) and LILACS (July 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: This review includes randomised controlled trials comparing day care and in-patient surgery for age-related cataract. The primary outcome was the achievement of a satisfactory visual acuity six weeks after the operation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Although two trials are included in the review, adequate data were available for only one trial and therefore pooling of data from studies was not attempted. A descriptive summary is presented. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials, involving a total of 1284 people, are included in this review. One trial reported statistically significant differences in early postoperative complication rates in the day care group, with an increased risk of increased intraocular pressure, which had no clinical relevance to visual outcomes four months postoperatively. The mean change in visual acuity (Snellen lines) of the operated eye four months postoperatively was 4.1 (standard deviation (SD) 2.3) for the day care group and 4.1 (SD 2.2) for the in-patient group and not statistically significant. The four-month postoperative mean change in quality of life score measured using the VF14 showed minimal differences between the two groups. Costs were 20% more for the in-patient group and this was attributed to higher costs for overnight stay. One study only reported hotel costs for the non-hospitalised participants making aggregation of data on costs impossible. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides some evidence that there is a cost saving but no significant difference in outcome or risk of postoperative complications between day care and in-patientcataract surgery. This is based on one detailed and methodologically sound trial conducted in the developed world. The success, safety and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery as a day care procedure appear to be acceptable but additional well-designed trials are required to confirm these perceptions.
Authors: Thomas Kohnen; Martin Baumeister; Daniel Kook; Oliver K Klaproth; Christian Ohrloff Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Riitta Suhonen; Heli Virtanen; Katja Heikkinen; Kirsi Johansson; Anne Kaljonen; Tiina Leppänen; Sanna Salanterä; Helena Leino-Kilpi Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-12-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Salvatore Cillino; Alessandra Casuccio; Francesco Di Pace; Francesco Pillitteri; Giovanni Cillino; Gaetano Lodato Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Maria Michela Gianino; Jacopo Lenzi; Marco Bonaudo; Maria Pia Fantini; Roberta Siliquini; Walter Ricciardi; Gianfranco Damiani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240