Literature DB >> 15744752

Bone and cartilage formation by skeletal muscle derived cells.

M Mastrogiacomo1, A R Derubeis, R Cancedda.   

Abstract

In adult individuals when most tissues have progressively lost the ability to regenerate, bone maintains the potential for a continuous self remodeling. The bone marrow has been so far the main recognized source of osteoprogenitor cells that contribute to the turnover of the skeletal scaffold. The possibility though exists that a pool of osteoprogenitor cells resides within other adult tissues and in particular, as reported previously, in other connective tissues such as fat and skeletal muscle. In an attempt to identify an alternative source of osteoprogenitor cells other than bone marrow we looked into the skeletal muscle. A plastic adhering cell population, from now on referred to as skeletal muscle derived cells (SMDCs), was obtained from biopsies of human skeletal muscle. SMDCs were clonogenic and displayed a fibroblast-like morphology. The isolated cell population had a mesenchymal origin as indicated by abundant expression of type I collagen, fibronectin, and vimentin and appeared heterogeneous. SMDCs were positive for alpha smooth actin, and to a lesser extent for desmin and alpha sarcomeric myosin, two specific markers of the myogenic phenotype. Surprisingly though SMDCs expressed early markers of an osteogenic commitment as indicated by positive staining for alkaline phosphatase, osteopontin, and osteonectin. Under the appropriate stimuli, these cells deposited in vitro a mineralized bone matrix and a proteoglycan rich matrix. In addition, SMDCs cultured in the presence of low serum and insulin differentiated towards adipocytes developing abundant lipid droplets in the cytoplasm. Furthermore SMDCs formed three-dimensional bone tissue in vivo when implanted in an immunodeficient mouse, and a mature cartilage rudiment when maintained as a pellet culture. In summary, we report the isolation and characterization of a cell population from the human skeletal muscle not only able to express in vitro specific markers of distinct mesenchymal lineages (adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic), but most importantly, able to complete the differentiation pathway leading to the formation of bone and cartilage. In this respect SMDCs resemble bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744752     DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of bone regeneration with human mesenchymal stem cells and muscle-derived stem cells and the critical role of BMP.

Authors:  Xueqin Gao; Arvydas Usas; Ying Tang; Aiping Lu; Jian Tan; Johannes Schneppendahl; Adam M Kozemchak; Bing Wang; James H Cummins; Rocky S Tuan; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity identifies a population of human skeletal muscle cells with high myogenic capacities.

Authors:  Karine Vauchez; Jean-Pierre Marolleau; Michel Schmid; Patricia Khattar; Alain Chapel; Cyril Catelain; Séverine Lecourt; Jérôme Larghéro; Marc Fiszman; Jean-Thomas Vilquin
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Identification and characterization of chondrogenic progenitor cells in the fascia of postnatal skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Guangheng Li; Bo Zheng; Laura B Meszaros; Joseph B Vella; Arvydas Usas; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Johnny Huard
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.216

4.  Comparative analysis of rat mesenchymal stem cells derived from slow and fast skeletal muscle in vitro.

Authors:  Etsuko Okumachi; Sang Yang Lee; Takahiro Niikura; Takashi Iwakura; Yoshihiro Dogaki; Takahiro Waki; Shunsuke Takahara; Takeshi Ueha; Yoshitada Sakai; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Role of donor and host cells in muscle-derived stem cell-mediated bone repair: differentiation vs. paracrine effects.

Authors:  Xueqin Gao; Arvydas Usas; Jonathan D Proto; Aiping Lu; James H Cummins; Alexander Proctor; Chien-Wen Chen; Johnny Huard
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein 2 via coacervate improves the osteogenic potential of muscle-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Hongshuai Li; Noah Ray Johnson; Arvydas Usas; Aiping Lu; Minakshi Poddar; Yadong Wang; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.940

7.  BMP2 is superior to BMP4 for promoting human muscle-derived stem cell-mediated bone regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Xueqin Gao; Arvydas Usas; Aiping Lu; Ying Tang; Bing Wang; Chien-Wen Chen; Hongshuai Li; Jessica C Tebbets; James H Cummins; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Comparative chondrogenesis of human cell sources in 3D scaffolds.

Authors:  R Seda Tigli; Sourabh Ghosh; Michael M Laha; Nirupama K Shevde; Laurence Daheron; Jeffrey Gimble; Menemşe Gümüşderelioglu; David L Kaplan
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.963

9.  Osteopontin promotes fibrosis in dystrophic mouse muscle by modulating immune cell subsets and intramuscular TGF-beta.

Authors:  Sylvia A Vetrone; Encarnacion Montecino-Rodriguez; Elena Kudryashova; Irina Kramerova; Eric P Hoffman; Scot D Liu; M Carrie Miceli; Melissa J Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Use of genetically modified muscle and fat grafts to repair defects in bone and cartilage.

Authors:  C H Evans; F-J Liu; V Glatt; J A Hoyland; C Kirker-Head; A Walsh; O Betz; J W Wells; V Betz; R M Porter; F A Saad; L C Gerstenfeld; T A Einhorn; M B Harris; M S Vrahas
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.