Literature DB >> 15744542

The vertebral interbody grafting site's low concentration in osteogenic progenitors can greatly benefit from addition of iliac crest bone marrow.

Mostafa Romih1, Joël Delécrin, Dominique Heymann, Norbert Passuti.   

Abstract

The ability of bone substitutes to promote bone fusion is contingent upon the presence of osteoinductive factors in the bone environment at the fusion site. Osteoblast progenitor cells are among these environmental osteoinductive factors, and one of the most abundant and available sources of osteoblastic cells is the bone marrow. As far as biological conditions are concerned, the vertebral interbody space appears as a favorable site for fusion, as it is surrounded by spongy bone, theoretically rich in osteogenic cells. This site may, however, not be as rich in osteogenic precursor cells especially at the time of grafting, because decortication of the vertebral end plates during the grafting process may modify cell content of the surrounding spongy bone. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the abundance of human osteogenic precursor cells in bone marrow derived from the iliac crest, the vertebral body, and the decorticated intervertebral body space. The number of potential osteoblast progenitors in each site was estimated by counting the alkaline phosphatase-expressing colony-forming units (CFU-AP). The results, however, demonstrate that the vertebral interbody space is actually poorer in osteoprogenitor cells than the iliac crest (P<0.001) and vertebral body (P<0.01), especially at the time of graft implantation. In light of our results, we advocate addition of iliac crest bone marrow aspirate to increase the success rate of vertebral interbody fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744542      PMCID: PMC3489213          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0827-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  9 in total

Review 1.  Influence of bone environment on ceramic osteointegration in spinal fusion: comparison of bone-poor and bone-rich sites.

Authors:  J Delécrin; C Deschamps; M Romih; D Heymann; N Passuti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Heterotopic osteogenesis in porous ceramics induced by marrow cells.

Authors:  H Ohgushi; V M Goldberg; A I Caplan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Osteogenic potential in vitro of human bone marrow cells cultured on macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic.

Authors:  J Toquet; R Rohanizadeh; J Guicheux; S Couillaud; N Passuti; G Daculsi; D Heymann
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-01

Review 4.  Enhancement of fracture-healing.

Authors:  T A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Augmentation of spinal arthrodesis with autologous bone marrow in a rabbit posterolateral spine fusion model.

Authors:  L J Curylo; B Johnstone; C A Petersilge; J A Janicki; J U Yoo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: the influence of aspiration volume.

Authors:  G F Muschler; C Boehm; K Easley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Age- and gender-related changes in the cellularity of human bone marrow and the prevalence of osteoblastic progenitors.

Authors:  G F Muschler; H Nitto; C A Boehm; K A Easley
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Isolation and characterization of osteoblast precursor cells from human bone marrow.

Authors:  D J Rickard; M Kassem; T E Hefferan; G Sarkar; T C Spelsberg; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Mesenchymal stem cells in bone development, bone repair, and skeletal regeneration therapy.

Authors:  S P Bruder; D J Fink; A I Caplan
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.429

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Influence of decortication of the recipient graft bed on graft integration and tissue neoformation in the graft-recipient bed interface.

Authors:  Fabiano R T Canto; Sergio B Garcia; João P M Issa; Anderson Marin; Elaine A Del Bel; Helton L A Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Vertebral body versus iliac crest bone marrow as a source of multipotential stromal cells: Comparison of processing techniques, tri-lineage differentiation and application on a scaffold for spine fusion.

Authors:  Evangelos M Fragkakis; Jehan Jomaa El-Jawhari; Robert A Dunsmuir; Peter A Millner; Abhay S Rao; Karen T Henshaw; Ippokratis Pountos; Elena Jones; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of intervertebral fusion rates of different bone graft materials in extreme lateral interbody fusion.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Jiaqi Li; Hao Cui; Fei Zhang; Yapeng Sun; Zeyang Li; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Lumbar spine intervertebral disc gene delivery of BMPs induces anterior spine fusion in lewis rats.

Authors:  Matthew E Cunningham; Natalie H Kelly; Bernard A Rawlins; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Chisa Hidaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Evaluation of tissue ingrowth and reaction of a porous polyethylene block as an onlay bone graft in rabbit posterior mandible.

Authors:  Teerapan Sosakul; Pongsatorn Tuchpramuk; Waraporn Suvannapruk; Autcharaporn Srion; Bunyong Rungroungdouyboon; Jintamai Suwanprateeb
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.