Literature DB >> 15744014

Contextual masking of oriented lines: interactions between surface segmentation cues.

Maarten J van der Smagt1, Christian Wehrhahn, Thomas D Albright.   

Abstract

The ability of human observers to detect and discriminate a single feature of a visual image deteriorates markedly when the targeted feature is surrounded by others of a similar kind. This perceptual masking is mirrored by the suppressive effects of surround stimulation on the responses of neurons in primary visual cortex (area V1). Both perceptual and neuronal masking effects are partially relieved, however, if the targeted image feature is distinguished from surrounding features along some dimension, such as contour orientation. Masking relief is likely to play an important role in perceptual segmentation of complex images. Because dissimilar surfaces usually differ along multiple feature dimensions, we tested the possibility that those differences may influence segmentation in an invariant manner. As expected, we found that the presence of surrounding features resulted in perceptual masking and neuronal response suppression in area V1, but that either orientation or contrast polarity differences between the target and surrounding features was sufficient to partially relieve these effects. Simultaneous differences along both dimensions, however, yielded no greater relief from masking than did either difference alone. Although the averaged neuronal effects of orientation polarity cues were thus invariant, the time course over which these effects emerged after each stimulus appearance was different for the two cues. These findings refine our understanding of the functions of nonclassical receptive fields, and they support a key role for V1 neurons in surface segmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744014     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00366.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Segmentation decreases the magnitude of the tilt illusion.

Authors:  Cheng Qiu; Daniel Kersten; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Psychophysical and physiological evidence contradicts a model of dynamic image stabilization.

Authors:  Christian Wehrhahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Contrast and phase combination in binocular vision.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cue combination encoding via contextual modulation of V1 and V2 neurons.

Authors:  Mark D Zarella; Daniel Y Ts'o
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2016-10-21

6.  Surround-Masking Affects Visual Estimation Ability.

Authors:  Nicola R Jastrzebski; Laila E Hugrass; Sheila G Crewther; David P Crewther
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.