Literature DB >> 15743898

Monitoring in vivo fitness of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mutants in a mouse biofilm infection model.

Jun Yu1, Jenny Wu, Kevin P Francis, Tony F Purchio, Jagath L Kadurugamuwa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate in vivo fitness of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mutants in a mouse biofilm model using bioluminescence imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: S. aureus was engineered with a luciferase operon to emit bioluminescence that can be detected in vivo using an IVIS imaging system. Two rifampicin-resistant strains of S. aureus that were previously isolated from animals undergoing rifampicin treatment, S464P (resistant to low concentrations of rifampicin) and H481Y (resistant to high concentrations of rifampicin), were characterized and then compared with their parental strain for in vivo fitness to form biofilm infections in the absence of rifampicin.
RESULTS: The mutant S464P showed better adaptation to in vivo growth than either the parental strain or H481Y without selective pressure. Six days after implanting pre-colonized catheters, bioluminescent signals were seen from 100% of the catheters coated by the mutant S464P. In comparison, only 83% and 61% of the catheters coated by the parental strain and H481Y, respectively, maintained a signal in vivo. Rifampicin treatment of S464P biofilms in vivo resulted in a slight decline, but earlier rebound in bioluminescence from these catheters compared with the parental signal, whereas rifampicin had no affect on bioluminescence in mice infected with mutant H481Y.
CONCLUSIONS: The mutant with low-level rifampicin resistance appears to be better adapted to in vivo growth than the mutant that has high-level rifampicin resistance. Moreover, the former mutant may actually have a slight competitive advantage over the rifampicin-susceptible strain (parental), raising awareness for the occurrence of such strains in clinical environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15743898     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  14 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive biophotonic imaging for studies of infectious disease.

Authors:  Nuria Andreu; Andrea Zelmer; Siouxsie Wiles
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 2.  Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance?

Authors:  Dan I Andersson; Diarmaid Hughes
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Mutant Evolution in Spatially Structured and Fragmented Expanding Populations.

Authors:  Dominik Wodarz; Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The RpoB H₄₈₁Y rifampicin resistance mutation and an active stringent response reduce virulence and increase resistance to innate immune responses in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Wei Gao; David R Cameron; John K Davies; Xenia Kostoulias; Justin Stepnell; Kellie L Tuck; Michael R Yeaman; Anton Y Peleg; Timothy P Stinear; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  The truncated phage lysin CHAP(k) eliminates Staphylococcus aureus in the nares of mice.

Authors:  Mark Fenton; Pat G Casey; Colin Hill; Cormac Gm Gahan; R Paul Ross; Olivia McAuliffe; Jim O'Mahony; Fiona Maher; Aidan Coffey
Journal:  Bioeng Bugs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

6.  The effect of rifaximin on gut flora and Staphylococcus resistance.

Authors:  Mi-Sung Kim; Walter Morales; Andres Ardila Hani; Sharon Kim; Gene Kim; Stacy Weitsman; Christopher Chang; Mark Pimentel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  In vitro activity of novel rifamycins against rifamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Christopher K Murphy; Steve Mullin; Marcia S Osburne; John van Duzer; Jim Siedlecki; Xiang Yu; Kathy Kerstein; Michael Cynamon; David M Rothstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effect of Macrolide and Rifampin Resistance on the Fitness of Rhodococcus equi.

Authors:  Jennifer M Willingham-Lane; Londa J Berghaus; Roy D Berghaus; Kelsey A Hart; Steeve Giguère
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  The impact of drug resistance on Mycobacterium tuberculosis physiology: what can we learn from rifampicin?

Authors:  Anastasia Koch; Valerie Mizrahi; Digby F Warner
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 7.163

Review 10.  The fitness costs of antibiotic resistance mutations.

Authors:  Anita H Melnyk; Alex Wong; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.