Literature DB >> 15743605

Visual processing of targets can reduce saccadic latencies.

Leo Trottier1, Jay Pratt.   

Abstract

Normal human saccadic reaction times (SRTs) have been thought to be approximately 200 ms. The present study, using an experimental method that takes advantage of what the saccade system has evolved to do (by instructing subjects to rapidly acquire detailed visual information from the environment), shows that human SRTs are actually on the order of 150 ms. Moreover, when combined with the sensory-based "gap" effect (removal of gaze fixation object prior to target presentation), this method yielded extremely low SRTs. These findings imply that previous approximations of human SRTs may have been too conservative, and that the group of saccades often classified as "express" may instead represent the norm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15743605     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Keep looking ahead? Re-direction of visual fixation does not always occur during an unpredictable obstacle avoidance task.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Aftab E Patla; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Having to identify a target reduces latencies in prosaccades but not in antisaccades.

Authors:  Nathalie Guyader; Jennifer Malsert; Christian Marendaz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-23

3.  The effects of task instructions on pro and antisaccade performance.

Authors:  Alisdair J G Taylor; Sam B Hutton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mixed saccadic paradigm releases top-down emotional interference in antisaccade and prosaccade trials.

Authors:  Jennifer Malsert; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of motor training on human express saccade production.

Authors:  Raquel Bibi; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Dave Kleinschmidt; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  The influence of attention and target identification on saccadic eye movements depends on prior target location.

Authors:  David R Hardwick; Timothy R H Cutmore; Trevor J Hine
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Looking for discriminating is different from looking for looking's sake.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Bieg; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Lewis L Chuang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Animal detection in natural images: effects of color and image database.

Authors:  Weina Zhu; Jan Drewes; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Oculomotor examination of the weapon focus effect: does a gun automatically engage visual attention?

Authors:  Heather D Flowe; Lorraine Hope; Anne P Hillstrom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.