Literature DB >> 15742722

Hydrocephalus shunts and waves of intracranial pressure.

Z H Czosnyka1, K Cieslicki, M Czosnyka, J D Pickard.   

Abstract

The majority of contemporary hydrocephalus valves are designed to introduce a low resistance to flow into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage pathway, and an therefore intended to stabilise intracranial pressure (ICP) at a level close to the shunt's operating pressure. However, this goal cannot always be attained. Accelerated CSF drainage with vertical body posture in ventriculo-peritoneal shunts is one reason for the ICP decreasing below the shunt's operating pressure. Another possible factor has been studied: the impact of the pulsating pattern in the ICP on the operating pressure. Six popular constructions of medium-pressure valves were studied (Radionics Low-profile, Delta, Hakim Precision, Holter, Integra In-line and Hakim NMT). Valves were mounted in the testing rig in the UK. Shunt Evaluation Laboratory and perfused with de-ionised water at a rate of 0.3 ml min(-1), and proximal pulsating pressures of different amplitudes (from 2 to 30mmHg peak-to-peak) and frequencies (70-10 cycles min(-1)) were superimposed. Laboratory findings were compared with clinical material containing recordings of ICP made in patients to diagnose reasons for ventriculomegaly. The mean operating pressure decreased in all valves when the simulated amplitude of heart pulsations increased. The rate of this decrease was dependent on the type of valve (variable from 2.5 to 5 mm Hg per increase in peak-to-peak amplitude by 10 mm Hg). The decrease was not related to the frequency of the wave. The relationship between pulse amplitude and ICP in 35 patients with blocked shunts was strong (R = 0.48; p < 0.03; slope 0.14) and in 25 patients with properly functioning shunts was non-significant (R = 0.057; p = 0.765). Two examples of decrease in mean ICP in the presence of increased vasogenic ICP waves in shunted patients are presented. The shunt operating pressure, which 'sets' the ICP in shunted patients may be influenced by the dynamics of a patient's ICP waveform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15742722     DOI: 10.1007/BF02345125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  10 in total

1.  Cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics after placement of a shunt with an antisiphon device: a long-term study.

Authors:  B Lundkvist; A Eklund; B Kristensen; M Fagerlund; L O Koskinen; J Malm
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Shunt testing in-vivo: a method based on the data from the UK shunt evaluation laboratory.

Authors:  Z H Czosnyka; M Czosnyka; J D Pickard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2002

3.  Analysis of intracranial pressure waveform during infusion test.

Authors:  M Czosnyka; P Wollk-Laniewski; L Batorski; W Zaworski
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Contribution of CSF and vascular factors to elevation of ICP in severely head-injured patients.

Authors:  A Marmarou; A L Maset; J D Ward; S Choi; D Brooks; H A Lutz; R J Moulton; J P Muizelaar; A DeSalles; H F Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Overdrainage and shunt technology. A critical comparison of programmable, hydrostatic and variable-resistance valves and flow-reducing devices.

Authors:  A Aschoff; P Kremer; C Benesch; K Fruh; A Klank; S Kunze
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics.

Authors:  A Marmarou; K Shulman; R M Rosende
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial volume-pressure relationships.

Authors:  C J Avezaat; J H van Eijndhoven; D J Wyper
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M J Albeck; S E Børgesen; F Gjerris; J F Schmidt; P S Sørensen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Link between vasogenic waves of intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  S Momjian; Z Czosnyka; M Czosnyka; J D Pickard
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  Posture-related overdrainage: comparison of the performance of 10 hydrocephalus shunts in vitro.

Authors:  Z Czosnyka; M Czosnyka; H K Richards; J D Pickard
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.654

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  A mathematical model of blood, cerebrospinal fluid and brain dynamics.

Authors:  Andreas A Linninger; Michalis Xenos; Brian Sweetman; Sukruti Ponkshe; Xiaodong Guo; Richard Penn
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Three-dimensional computational prediction of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the human brain.

Authors:  Brian Sweetman; Michalis Xenos; Laura Zitella; Andreas A Linninger
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Hydrogel Check-Valves for the Treatment of Hydrocephalic Fluid Retention with Wireless Fully-Passive Sensor for the Intracranial Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Seunghyun Lee; Shiyi Liu; Ruth E Bristol; Mark C Preul; Jennifer Blain Christen
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  In vitro hydrodynamic properties of the Miethke ProGAV hydrocephalus shunt.

Authors:  David M Allin; Zofia H Czosnyka; Marek Czosnyka; Hugh K Richards; John D Pickard
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2006-06-29

5.  Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: New challenges in health and disease.

Authors:  Conrad E Johanson; John A Duncan; Petra M Klinge; Thomas Brinker; Edward G Stopa; Gerald D Silverberg
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2008-05-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.