OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in horses and horse personnel. DESIGN: Prospective prevalence study. SAMPLE POPULATION: 972 horses and 107 personnel from equine farms in Ontario, Canada and New York state. PROCEDURE: Nasal swab specimens were collected from horses and humans on farms with (targeted surveillance) and without (nontargeted surveillance) a history of MRSA colonization or infection in horses during the preceding year. Selective culture for MRSA was performed. Isolates were typed via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antibiograms were determined. RESULTS: MRSA was isolated from 46 of 972 (4.7%) horses (0/581 via nontargeted surveillance and 46/391 [12%] via targeted surveillance). Similarly, MRSA was isolated from 14 of 107 (13%) humans (2/41 [5%] from nontargeted surveillance and 12/66 [18%] from targeted surveillance). All isolates were subtypes of Canadian epidemic MRSA-5, an uncommon strain in humans. All isolates were resistant to at least 1 antimicrobial class in addition to beta-lactams. On all farms with colonized horses, at least 1 human was colonized with an indistinguishable subtype. For horses, residing on a farm that housed > 20 horses was the only factor significantly associated with MRSA colonization. For humans, regular contact with > 20 horses was the only identified risk factor. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results confirm a reservoir of colonized horses on a variety of farms in Ontario and New York and provide evidence that 1 MRSA strain is predominantly involved in MRSA colonization in horses and humans that work with horses.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in horses and horse personnel. DESIGN: Prospective prevalence study. SAMPLE POPULATION: 972 horses and 107 personnel from equine farms in Ontario, Canada and New York state. PROCEDURE: Nasal swab specimens were collected from horses and humans on farms with (targeted surveillance) and without (nontargeted surveillance) a history of MRSA colonization or infection in horses during the preceding year. Selective culture for MRSA was performed. Isolates were typed via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antibiograms were determined. RESULTS: MRSA was isolated from 46 of 972 (4.7%) horses (0/581 via nontargeted surveillance and 46/391 [12%] via targeted surveillance). Similarly, MRSA was isolated from 14 of 107 (13%) humans (2/41 [5%] from nontargeted surveillance and 12/66 [18%] from targeted surveillance). All isolates were subtypes of Canadian epidemic MRSA-5, an uncommon strain in humans. All isolates were resistant to at least 1 antimicrobial class in addition to beta-lactams. On all farms with colonized horses, at least 1 human was colonized with an indistinguishable subtype. For horses, residing on a farm that housed > 20 horses was the only factor significantly associated with MRSA colonization. For humans, regular contact with > 20 horses was the only identified risk factor. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results confirm a reservoir of colonized horses on a variety of farms in Ontario and New York and provide evidence that 1 MRSA strain is predominantly involved in MRSA colonization in horses and humans that work with horses.
Authors: Kerry R Leedom Larson; Abby L Harper; Blake M Hanson; Michael J Male; Shylo E Wardyn; Anne E Dressler; Elizabeth A Wagstrom; Shaliesh Tendolkar; Daniel J Diekema; Kelley J Donham; Tara C Smith Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Michelle Barton; Michael Hawkes; Dorothy Moore; John Conly; Lindsay Nicolle; Upton Allen; Nora Boyd; Joanne Embree; Liz Van Horne; Nicole Le Saux; Susan Richardson; Aideen Moore; Dat Tran; Valerie Waters; Mary Vearncombe; Kevin Katz; J Scott Weese; John Embil; Marianna Ofner-Agostini; E Lee Ford-Jones Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Yihan Lin; Emily Barker; Jennifer Kislow; Pravin Kaldhone; Mary E Stemper; Madhulatha Pantrangi; Frances M Moore; Matthew Hall; Thomas R Fritsche; Thomas Novicki; Steven L Foley; Sanjay K Shukla Journal: Clin Med Res Date: 2010-08-25
Authors: Nathalie Tokateloff; Stephen T Manning; J Scott Weese; John Campbell; Jamie Rothenburger; Craig Stephen; Vanessa Bastura; Sheryl P Gow; Richard Reid-Smith Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: D O Morris; E Lautenbach; T Zaoutis; K Leckerman; P H Edelstein; S C Rankin Journal: Zoonoses Public Health Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 2.702