Literature DB >> 15742334

Snail, Slug, and Smad-interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma.

Sivan Elloul1, Mari Bukholt Elstrand, Jahn M Nesland, Claes G Tropé, Gunnar Kvalheim, Iris Goldberg, Reuven Reich, Ben Davidson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It was demonstrated previously that the Snail family of transcription factors and Smad-interacting protein 1 (Sip1) regulate E-cadherin and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) expression, cellular morphology, and invasion in carcinoma. For the current study, the authors analyzed the relation between the expression of Snail, Slug, and Sip1; the expression of MMP-2 and E-cadherin; and clinical parameters in patients with metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma.
METHODS: One hundred one fresh-frozen, malignant effusions from patients who were diagnosed with gynecologic carcinomas (78 ovarian carcinomas and 23 breast carcinomas) were studied for mRNA expression of Snail, Slug, Sip1, MMP-2, and E-cadherin using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis. Snail mRNA and E-cadherin protein expression levels also were studied in ovarian carcinoma effusions using in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry. The results were analyzed for possible correlation with clinicopathologic parameters in both tumor types.
RESULTS: E-cadherin mRNA expression was lower in breast carcinoma (P = 0.001), whereas Snail expression was higher (P = 0.003). The Snail/E-cadherin ratio (P < 0.001) and the Sip1/E-cadherin ratio (P = 0.002) were higher in breast carcinomas. Sip1 mRNA expression (P < 0.001) and Slug mRNA expression (P < 0.001) were correlated with the expression of MMP-2 in ovarian carcinomas. The Sip1/E-cadherin ratio was higher in primary ovarian carcinomas at the time of diagnosis compared with postchemotherapy ovarian carcinoma effusions (P = 0.003), higher in Stage IV tumors compared with Stage III tumors (P = 0.049), and higher in pleural effusions compared with peritoneal effusions (P = 0.044). In a univariate survival analysis of patients with ovarian carcinoma, a high Sip1/E-cadherin ratio predicted poor overall survival (P = 0.018). High E-cadherin mRNA expression predicted better disease-free survival (P = 0.023), with a similar trend for a low Slug/E-cadherin ratio (P = 0.07). High Snail mRNA expression predicted shorter effusion-free survival (P = 0.008), disease-free survival (P = 0.03), and overall survival (P = 0.008) in patients with breast carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcription factors that regulate E-cadherin were expressed differentially in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. Snail may predict a poor outcome in patients who have breast carcinoma metastatic to effusions. E-cadherin expression generally was conserved in effusions from patients with ovarian carcinoma, but the subset of patients with postulated Sip1-induced repression of this adhesion molecule had a significantly worse outcome. This finding was in agreement with the stronger suppression of E-cadherin by Snail and Sip1 in breast carcinoma effusions, a clinical condition associated with extremely poor survival. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15742334     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  175 in total

Review 1.  Involvement of members of the cadherin superfamily in cancer.

Authors:  Geert Berx; Frans van Roy
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Evolutionary functional analysis and molecular regulation of the ZEB transcription factors.

Authors:  Alexander Gheldof; Paco Hulpiau; Frans van Roy; Bram De Craene; Geert Berx
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  The ZEB/miR-200 feedback loop--a motor of cellular plasticity in development and cancer?

Authors:  Simone Brabletz; Thomas Brabletz
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 4.  Epithelial mesenchymal transition traits in human breast cancer cell lines parallel the CD44(hi/)CD24 (lo/-) stem cell phenotype in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Tony Blick; Honor Hugo; Edwin Widodo; Mark Waltham; Cletus Pinto; Sendurai A Mani; Robert A Weinberg; Richard M Neve; Marc E Lenburg; Erik W Thompson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  PINCH-2 expression in cancers involving serosal effusions using quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Y Yuan; H P Dong; D A Nymoen; J M Nesland; C Wu; B Davidson
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.073

6.  The transcription factors Slug (SNAI2) and Snail (SNAI1) regulate phospholipase D (PLD) promoter in opposite ways towards cancer cell invasion.

Authors:  Ramya Ganesan; Elizabeth Mallets; Julian Gomez-Cambronero
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Insights into the epithelial mesenchymal transition phenotype in cancer of unknown primary from a global microRNA profiling study.

Authors:  A Stoyianni; G Pentheroudakis; H Benjamin; A Cervantes; K Ashkenazi; G Lazaridis; N Pavlidis; Y Spector
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Overexpression of the EMT driver brachyury in breast carcinomas: association with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Claudia Palena; Mario Roselli; Mary T Litzinger; Patrizia Ferroni; Leopoldo Costarelli; Antonella Spila; Francesco Cavaliere; Bruce Huang; Romaine I Fernando; Duane H Hamilton; Caroline Jochems; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Qing Cheng; H Kim Lyerly; Jeffrey Schlom; Fiorella Guadagni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Expression of SIP1 is strongly correlated with LDHA and shows a significantly poor outcome in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xuren Sun; Zhe Sun; Zhi Zhu; Chenyan Li; Junyan Zhang; Huimian Xu; Mingjun Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-26

10.  RCP induces Slug expression and cancer cell invasion by stabilizing β1 integrin.

Authors:  M H Hwang; K H Cho; K J Jeong; Y-Y Park; J M Kim; S-L Yu; C G Park; G B Mills; H Y Lee
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.