Literature DB >> 15742287

A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.

Joe I-Chiang Chou1, Hwai-Jen Fong, Shou-Hsin Kuang, Lin-Yang Gi, Fang-Yi Hwang, Yu-Chieng Lai, Richard Che-Shoa Chang, Shou-Yen Kao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was an analysis of the soft and hard tissue changes of the facial profile after bilateral sagittal splitting osteotomy for mandibular setback of Taiwanese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected pre- and postsurgical lateral cephalographs of 64 patients (28 males, 36 females) with skeletal Class III malocclusion who received combined orthodontic-surgical treatment with bilateral sagittal splitting osteotomy mandibular setback at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 1994 and 2000. Nineteen cephalometric parameters of (14 linear, 4 angular, and the BS index) soft and hard tissues were measured at 1 week before treatment, and 2 months and 1 year after surgery, and analyzed by paired t test.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 20.0 +/- 1.6 years. The patients underwent an average of 7 mm mandibular setback at the osseous pogonion (Pog). Average setbacks at Pog and soft tissue pogonion (pog) were 5.54 mm and 4.85 mm, respectively, at 1 year after surgery. The setback ratio of Pog/pog was 1:0.88. The hard tissue relapse at Pog was 21% at 1 year after surgery. Improvement in prognathic profile was demonstrated by significant changes in the positions of Pog and pog, ANB angle, the distance from lower lip to esthetic line (E-L lip), and the BS index after surgery. However, compared with parameters obtained from a normal Taiwanese population, the cephalometric data of Pog, pog, and BS index still indicated mild prognathism.
CONCLUSION: Although mandibular prognathism could be grossly improved by bilateral sagittal splitting osteotomy mandibular setback, a significant amount of relapse occurred within 1 year after surgery. The extent of the postoperatively preserved features showing mandibular prognathism should be a concern for both patients and physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15742287     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Stability of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Comparison between positioning screws and plate.

Authors:  Nasser Nooh
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-10-29

2.  Orthognathic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Severe Facial Asymmetry.

Authors:  Ezgi Atik; Ersoy Konaş; İlken Kocadereli
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-01

3.  Stability after mandibular setback: mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery.

Authors:  William R Proffit; Ceib Phillips; Timothy A Turvey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Soft tissue response in orthognathic surgery patients treated by bimaxillary osteotomy: cephalometry compared with 2-D photogrammetry.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Alice Martin
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-05

5.  Soft tissue changes and its stability as a sequlae to mandibular advancement.

Authors:  Uday Kiran Uppada; Ramen Sinha; D Sreenatha Reddy; Dushyanth Paul
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

6.  A Comparative Evaluation of Changes in Soft Tissues After Single-Jaw Surgery and Bimaxillary Surgery in Skeletal Class III Patients.

Authors:  Christy John Parappallil; Ratna Parameswaran; Devaki Vijayalakshmi; Benjamin George Thomas Mavelil
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-01-10

7.  The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Jung-Hsuan Cheng; Michael Yuan-Chien Chen; Kwei-Jing Chen; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.