Literature DB >> 15742283

Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Krishna Yeshwant1, Edward B Seldin, Jaime Gateno, Peter Everett, Carl L White, Ron Kikinis, Leonard B Kaban, Maria J Troulis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use geometric parameters of movement, calculated from 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) data, to determine the curvilinear distractor dimensions required to correct mandibular deformities in a series of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative CT scans from 15 patients with symmetric (n = 5) and asymmetric (n = 10) deformities were imported into a CT-based software program (Osteoplan; an open-source visualization application developed by Gering et al at the Surgical Planning Laboratory [SPL, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA]). The software was used to reconstruct virtual 3-dimensional models from these scans. Two experienced surgeons, working with a computer scientist, then used Osteoplan to create an ideal treatment plan for each patient. In each case, the 3-dimensional curvilinear movement was quantified using 4 "parameters of movement" (POMs). These parameters were then used to prescribe a distraction device capable of executing the planned skeletal correction. Curvilinear distractor dimensions calculated by Osteoplan included the radius of curvature of the prescribed device, and the distractor elongation, pitch, and handedness.
RESULTS: Treatment plans including POMs were developed for each patient. The radii of curvature for the prescribed distractors ranged from 2.3 to 14.1 cm, the distractor elongation dimensions ranged from 0.7 to 3.2 cm, and the pitch (horizontal plane) dimensions ranged from 0.005 to 0.8 cm. Handedness was either a left (n = 12) or right (n = 8) turning helix.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that, using geometric parameters of movement calculated from 3-dimensional CT scans, curvilinear devices could be prescribed for correction of the range of skeletal deformities in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15742283     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Imaging, virtual planning, design, and production of patient-specific implants and clinical validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Per Dérand; Lars-Erik Rännar; Jan-M Hirsch
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-09

2.  Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities.

Authors:  Leonard B Kaban; Edward B Seldin; Ron Kikinis; Krishna Yeshwant; Bonnie L Padwa; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Reproducibility of three-dimensional coordinate systems based on craniofacial landmarks: a tentative evaluation of four systems created on images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography with a large field of view.

Authors:  Momoko Shibata; Hiroyuki Nawa; Yoshitaka Kise; Mariko Fuyamada; Kazuhito Yoshida; Akitoshi Katsumata; Eiichiro Ariji; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.