Literature DB >> 15741622

Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate.

Jong-Beom Park1, Yong-Sun Cho, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been our experience that ossification occurs adjacent to anterior cervical plates. Our hypothesis was that the closer the plate is to the adjacent disc space, the greater the ossification.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the lateral radiographs of the cervical spine of 118 patients who had a solid fusion following an anterior cervical arthrodesis with a plate for the treatment of a degenerative cervical condition; none of the patients had had cervical spine surgery prior to the index arthrodesis. The plate-to-disc distance was measured on the postoperative lateral radiograph and was used to divide the patients into two groups for each of the two adjacent disc spaces. In group A the plate-to-disc distance was <5 mm, and in group B it was >/=5 mm. The mean duration of follow-up was 25.7 months. The severity of the ossification at the two adjacent disc spaces was classified on a scale ranging from grade 0 (no ossification) to grade 3 (complete bridging). Eighteen patients were excluded from the measurement of the severity of the caudal ossification because overlapping by the bone of the shoulder precluded adequate visualization of the caudal level.
RESULTS: Ossification developed in seventy (59%) of the 118 cephalad adjacent disc spaces and twenty-nine (29%) of the 100 caudal adjacent disc spaces (p < 0.001). The mean cephalad plate-to-disc distance was shorter than the mean caudal plate-to-disc distance (p < 0.001). The rate of ossification was higher in group A than in group B, both at the cephalad adjacent disc spaces (67% compared with 24%) and at the caudal adjacent disc spaces (45% compared with 5%) (both p < 0.001). In addition, 93% (twenty-six) of the twenty-eight cases of moderate-to-severe ossification developed in group A.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a positive association between adjacent-level ossification following anterior cervical plate procedures and the plate-to-disc distance. We now strive to place anterior cervical plates at least 5 mm away from the adjacent disc spaces in order to decrease the likelihood of moderate-to-severe adjacent-level ossification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15741622     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  58 in total

Review 1.  Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fanor M Saavedra-Pozo; Renato A M Deusdara; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study Evaluating an Integrated Screw and Interbody Spacer for One- and Two-Level ACDF.

Authors:  Paul D Lane; Jacob L Cox; Roger B Gaskins; Brandon G Santoni; James B Billys; Antonio E Castellvi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Iatrogenic contributions to cervical adjacent segment pathology: review article.

Authors:  Haruki Ueda; Russel C Huang; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-08-02

Review 5.  Adjacent level disease-background and update based on disc replacement data.

Authors:  I David Kaye; Alan S Hilibrand
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 6.  A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub; James D Toombs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-18

7.  Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Akira Kitada; Satoko Naitou; Atsuko Tachibana; Yuya Ito; Akira Fujikawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-05

8.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yachao Zhao; Sidong Yang; Yachong Huo; Zhaohui Li; Dalong Yang; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Using the modified Delphi method to establish a new Chinese clinical consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Lei Zang; Ning Fan; Yong Hai; S B Lu; Q J Su; J C Yang; Peng Du; Y J Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.