Literature DB >> 15741613

Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in children and adolescents. Its role in clinical decision-making.

Scott J Luhmann1, Mario Schootman, J Eric Gordon, Rick W Wright.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have questioned the utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric knee disorders because of the morphologic changes during growth and the low accuracy of the formal interpretation of the magnetic resonance imaging scan by a radiologist. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to report the accuracy of formal interpretations of magnetic resonance imaging scans of the knee in children and adolescent patients by a radiologist, and (2) to determine the benefit, if any, of a personal review of the magnetic resonance imaging scan of the knee by the orthopaedic surgeon, as a routine part of the diagnostic evaluation.
METHODS: A three-year prospective study of all patients who underwent knee arthroscopy performed by a single surgeon, at two children's hospitals, was completed. The analysis focused on the six most common diagnoses: anterior cruciate ligament tear, lateral meniscal tear, medial meniscal tear, osteochondritis dissecans, discoid lateral meniscus, and osteochondral fracture. The preoperative diagnosis of the surgeon was determined by integrating the history and the findings on the clinical examination, plain radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging scans (including the radiologist's interpretation).
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with ninety-six abnormal knees were included. The mean age was 14.6 years at the time of surgery. Relative to operative findings, kappa values for the formal interpretations of the magnetic resonance imaging scans by a radiologist were 0.78 for an anterior cruciate ligament tear, 0.76 for a medial meniscal tear, 0.71 for a lateral meniscal tear, 0.70 for osteochondritis dissecans, 0.46 for discoid lateral meniscus, and 0.65 for osteochondral fracture. Relative to operative findings, kappa values for the preoperative diagnoses by the surgeon were 1.00 for an anterior cruciate ligament tear, 0.90 for a medial meniscal tear, 0.92 for a lateral meniscal tear, 0.93 for osteochondritis dissecans, 1.00 for discoid lateral meniscus, and 0.90 for osteochondral fracture. The preoperative diagnosis by the surgeon was better (p < 0.05) than the formal interpretation of the magnetic resonance imaging scans by the radiologist with respect to an anterior cruciate ligament tear, lateral meniscal tear, osteochondritis dissecans, and discoid lateral meniscus.
CONCLUSIONS: Integration of patient information with an orthopaedic surgeon's review of the magnetic resonance imaging scan of the knee in children and adolescent patients improves the identification of pathological disorders in four of the six categories evaluated. This study questions the necessity for and appropriateness of a routine interpretation of a magnetic resonance imaging scan of the knee in children and adolescents by a radiologist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15741613     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

Review 1.  The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of MRI for identification and classification of knee osteochondritis dissecans.

Authors:  Carmen E Quatman; Catherine C Quatman-Yates; Laura C Schmitt; Mark V Paterno
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The condylar cutoff sign: quantifying lateral femoral condylar hypoplasia in a complete discoid meniscus.

Authors:  Chul-Won Ha; Yong Seuk Lee; Jae Chul Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mapping tibiofemoral gonarthrosis: an MRI analysis of non-traumatic knee cartilage defects.

Authors:  D S Evangelopoulos; M Huesler; S S Ahmad; E Aghayev; M Neukamp; C Röder; A Exadaktylos; H Bonel; S Kohl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  [Diagnostic approaches to acute knee injury in childhood and adolescence. Yesterday and today].

Authors:  M Maier; E V Geiger; L Sellnow; D Schneidmüller; N Vennemann; M Mack; I Marzi
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament injury diagnosis and management in a pediatric patient: a case report.

Authors:  Charles Hazle; Cherie Duby
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-12

6.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and pre-surgical evaluation in the assessment of traumatic intra-articular knee disorders in children and adolescents: what conditions still pose diagnostic challenges?

Authors:  Itai Gans; Maria A Bedoya; Victor Ho-Fung; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-08-31

7.  Accuracy of cartilage-specific 3-Tesla 3D-DESS magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of chondral lesions: comparison with knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Sandro Kohl; Simon Meier; Sufian S Ahmad; Harald Bonel; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Anna Krismer; Dimitrios Stergios Evangelopoulos
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Sensitivity and Specificity of MRI in Diagnosing Concomitant Meniscal Injuries With Pediatric and Adolescent Acute ACL Tears.

Authors:  Brody J Dawkins; David A Kolin; Joshua Park; Peter D Fabricant; Allison Gilmore; Mark Seeley; R Justin Mistovich
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-09

9.  Computed tomography of the shoulders in patients with obstetric brachial plexus injuries: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Rahul K Nath; Andrea D Humphries
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2008-11-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.