Literature DB >> 15741145

Soil respiration in a mixed temperate forest and its contribution to total ecosystem respiration.

J Curiel Yuste1, M Nagy, I A Janssens, A Carrara, R Ceulemans.   

Abstract

Soil respiration (SR) was measured with an infrared gas analyzer in nine plots representative of the heterogeneous vegetation in a mixed coniferous-deciduous forest in the Belgian Campine region. Selected plots included the two most representative overstory species (Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus robur L.) in combination with the most representative understory species of the forest. A model that includes temperature and water as the main controlling variables was fitted to the data. We found large spatial variability in SR among plots, with typically lower fluxes under the coniferous overstory than under the deciduous overstory (means of 4.8 +/- 0.4 and 8.8 +/- 0.5 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1), respectively). Total annual soil carbon (C) emissions were estimated by weighting fluxes from different types of vegetation according to their relative contribution to the footprint area of the eddy covariance flux measurement. The relative contribution of the two main tree species to the footprint-weighted total SR varied among seasons with the more abundant coniferous overstory contributing the most to total SR during most of the year. Nonetheless, during summer, the contribution of deciduous plots to total SR was disproportionally high because of the more pronounced seasonality of belowground metabolic activity. Net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange was measured by eddy covariance, and we estimated total ecosystem respiration (TER) with footprint-constrained nighttime fluxes. Mean total annual SR and TER were 6.1 +/- 0.11 and 9.1 +/- 1.15 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1), respectively. The 95% confidence interval of the ratio of annual SR:TER ranged from 0.58 to 0.76, with a mean of 0.67. The contribution of SR to TER tended to vary seasonally, with minimum contributions during summer (less than 50% of TER) and maximum contributions during winter (about 94% of TER).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15741145     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.5.609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  7 in total

1.  Soil CO2 efflux in a bioenergy plantation with fast-growing Populus trees - influence of former land use, inter-row spacing and genotype.

Authors:  M S Verlinden; L S Broeckx; H Wei; R Ceulemans
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.192

2.  Total and component carbon fluxes of a Scots pine ecosystem from chamber measurements and eddy covariance.

Authors:  Tianshan Zha; Sini Niinisto; Zisheng Xing; Kai-Yun Wang; Seppo Kellomäki; Alan G Barr
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Distinct microbial limitations in litter and underlying soil revealed by carbon and nutrient fertilization in a tropical rainforest.

Authors:  Nicolas Fanin; Sandra Barantal; Nathalie Fromin; Heidy Schimann; Patrick Schevin; Stephan Hättenschwiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  In situ CO2 efflux from leaf litter layer showed large temporal variation induced by rapid wetting and drying cycle.

Authors:  Mioko Ataka; Yuji Kominami; Kenichi Yoshimura; Takafumi Miyama; Mayuko Jomura; Makoto Tani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Estimating daytime ecosystem respiration to improve estimates of gross primary production of a temperate forest.

Authors:  Jinwei Sun; Jiabing Wu; Dexin Guan; Fuqi Yao; Fenghui Yuan; Anzhi Wang; Changjie Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Response of soil respiration and ecosystem carbon budget to vegetation removal in Eucalyptus plantations with contrasting ages.

Authors:  Jianping Wu; Zhanfeng Liu; Guomin Huang; Dima Chen; Weixin Zhang; Yuanhu Shao; Songze Wan; Shenglei Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO2 is not emitted directly to the atmosphere.

Authors:  Enrique P Sánchez-Cañete; Greg A Barron-Gafford; Jon Chorover
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.