Literature DB >> 15741037

A randomized observer blind comparison of bilateral facial ice pack therapy with no ice therapy following third molar surgery.

A J van der Westhuijzen1, P J Becker, J Morkel, J A Roelse.   

Abstract

This study compares the efficacy of Tecnol bilateral facial ice packs with no cold therapy in reducing pain, swelling and trismus during the first 24 h following third molar surgery. Sixty patients requiring general anaesthesia for removal of bilateral, impacted third molar teeth were included and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group received Tecnol bilateral facial ice packs following surgery, while a control group received no form of cold therapy. Facial ice packs were applied in the recovery room within 15 min of the end surgery and patients were asked to use the ice packs continuously for the next 24 h. Surgical and anaesthetic techniques as well as pharmacological regimens were standardized. Postoperative pain levels were compared hourly, for 4 h, then on the evening of surgery and the following morning. Facial swelling and trismus were compared preoperatively and 24 h postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatment groups with respect to pain, facial swelling or trismus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15741037     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  18 in total

Review 1.  Management of inflammatory complications in third molar surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  O D Osunde; R A Adebola; U K Omeje
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Cooling for the reduction of postoperative pain: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  M Koç; M Tez; O Yoldaş; H Dizen; E Göçmen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Pre- and postoperative management techniques. Before and after. Part 2: the removal of third molars.

Authors:  J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Pre- and post-operative management of dental implant placement. Part 2: management of early-presenting complications.

Authors:  G Bryce; D I Bomfim; G S Bassi
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Cryotherapy and topical minocycline as adjunctive measures to control pain after third molar surgery: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Savannah Gelesko; Leann Long; Jan Faulk; Ceib Phillips; Carolyn Dicus; Raymond P White
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Do Ice Packs Reduce Postoperative Midline Incision Pain, NSAID or Narcotic Use?

Authors:  Bharadhwaj Ravindhran; Sendhil Rajan; Gayatri Balachandran; L N Mohan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Randomized double blind comparative study on the efficacy of Ibuprofen and aceclofenac in controlling post-operative sequelae after third molar surgery.

Authors:  Neha Jain; Anisha Maria
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-04-22

8.  Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study.

Authors:  Y Gulnahar; A-L Alpan
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2021-05-01

9.  Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar.

Authors:  Francesco Sortino; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-10

10.  Alveolar iodine tampon packing after impacted third molar surgery improves oral health-related quality of life and postoperative sequela: a randomized study.

Authors:  Jerome A Lindeboom; Jacco G Tuk; Patrick Möllenkamp; Arjen J van Wijk
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.