OBJECTIVE: The immune response against human-leucocyte-antigens on donor-cells may be an important factor contributing to the degeneration of allograft-valves. We have previously reported that the use of the decellularized allograft SynerGraft (CryoLife) reduces the immunologic response of the allograft-recipient. In this study we compare the echocardiographic and computed tomography angiographic (CTA) findings of SynerGrafts with conventional cryopreserved allografts. METHODS: 22 patients who received a pulmonary SynerGraft (SG-group) (21 during a Ross-procedure) underwent CTA and resting echocardiography (median: 10 months postoperatively). 47 randomly chosen patients who underwent a Ross-procedure served as controls (C-group) (median: 32 months postoperatively). RESULTS: Neither the pressure gradients (mean: SG=9+/-4 vs C=10+/-4mmHg; P=0.64) across the allograft, nor the effective orifice area (EOAI) (SG=0.93+/-0.80 vs C=0.93+/-0.42cm(2)/m(2); P=0.96) differed between the groups. The EOAI showed a significant correlation with the smallest allograft-conduit-area measured on CTA (r=0.81; P<0.001) which was most frequently (n=34) found in the proximal postvalvular tubular part of the conduit. Calcifications (n=11) or a fibroproliferative reaction (n=15) were rarely observed. Overall, there were no radiologic differences between the groups. On CTA, the smallest diameter of the allograft-conduits was significantly smaller than the diameter given on the cryopreservation protocol (SG=16+/-3 and C=17+/-3mm vs 25mm in both groups; P<0.001 each) whereas the diameter of the distal part of the allograft was not (SG=24+/-2, P=0.066, and C=25+/-3mm, P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant shorter follow-up in the SynerGraft-group, no functional or radiologic differences were observed as compared to control-patients. The smallest diameter is located almost exclusively at the proximal level of allograft-conduits.
OBJECTIVE: The immune response against human-leucocyte-antigens on donor-cells may be an important factor contributing to the degeneration of allograft-valves. We have previously reported that the use of the decellularized allograft SynerGraft (CryoLife) reduces the immunologic response of the allograft-recipient. In this study we compare the echocardiographic and computed tomography angiographic (CTA) findings of SynerGrafts with conventional cryopreserved allografts. METHODS: 22 patients who received a pulmonary SynerGraft (SG-group) (21 during a Ross-procedure) underwent CTA and resting echocardiography (median: 10 months postoperatively). 47 randomly chosen patients who underwent a Ross-procedure served as controls (C-group) (median: 32 months postoperatively). RESULTS: Neither the pressure gradients (mean: SG=9+/-4 vs C=10+/-4mmHg; P=0.64) across the allograft, nor the effective orifice area (EOAI) (SG=0.93+/-0.80 vs C=0.93+/-0.42cm(2)/m(2); P=0.96) differed between the groups. The EOAI showed a significant correlation with the smallest allograft-conduit-area measured on CTA (r=0.81; P<0.001) which was most frequently (n=34) found in the proximal postvalvular tubular part of the conduit. Calcifications (n=11) or a fibroproliferative reaction (n=15) were rarely observed. Overall, there were no radiologic differences between the groups. On CTA, the smallest diameter of the allograft-conduits was significantly smaller than the diameter given on the cryopreservation protocol (SG=16+/-3 and C=17+/-3mm vs 25mm in both groups; P<0.001 each) whereas the diameter of the distal part of the allograft was not (SG=24+/-2, P=0.066, and C=25+/-3mm, P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant shorter follow-up in the SynerGraft-group, no functional or radiologic differences were observed as compared to control-patients. The smallest diameter is located almost exclusively at the proximal level of allograft-conduits.
Authors: José Rodolfo Paniagua Gutierrez; Helen Berry; Sotirios Korossis; Saeed Mirsadraee; Sergio Veiga Lopes; Francisco da Costa; John Kearney; Kevin Watterson; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: A Aldridge; A Desai; H Owston; L M Jennings; J Fisher; P Rooney; J N Kearney; E Ingham; S P Wilshaw Journal: Cell Tissue Bank Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 1.522
Authors: Steve W F R Waqanivavalagi; Sameer Bhat; Marcus B Ground; Paget F Milsom; Jillian Cornish Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 1.637
Authors: Tayyebeh Vafaee; Daniel Thomas; Amisha Desai; Louise M Jennings; Helen Berry; Paul Rooney; John Kearney; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.963