Literature DB >> 15740179

Do antidepressants reduce the burden imposed by depression on employers?

Mark J Greener1, Julian F Guest.   

Abstract

The ability to perform paid or unpaid work is integral to an individual's quality of life. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review to examine the impact of depression and its treatment on occupational outcomes. This review found absenteeism from work to be markedly higher among depressed employees and productivity to be dramatically undermined by some symptoms of depression. Gaps in the published literature point to the need for future economic and clinical analyses to include work-related outcomes. Published studies showed that antidepressants can enhance work-related outcomes by alleviating affective symptoms. However, the pharmacological properties of antidepressants may produce differential effects that influence work-related outcomes in other ways. For example, TCAs, but not SSRIs, produce sedation and impair cognitive function in ways that could undermine work-related outcomes. Formal analyses are required to quantify whether the improved social functioning, motivation and vigilance that may be associated with some newer antidepressants translate into improved work-related outcomes. Although few published studies have directly quantified the cost benefit of managing depression and associated lost productivity, existing studies that directly assessed work-related outcomes have suggested that treating depression is cost effective. Gaps in the published literature imply that the impact of depression and antidepressants on occupational outcomes has been understudied. This reflects, in part, the fact that antidepressant studies lasting 4 or 6 weeks are unlikely to capture the impact of treatment on work-related measures. In addition, the current evidence base is fraught with other methodological limitations. The effect of depression on non-paid employment also requires further assessment. In conclusion, the efficacy of antidepressants on work-related outcomes should be measured in clinical trials that have an adequate design and a suitable follow-up period, and included in health technology assessments. Until such studies are available, the evidence base supporting the use of antidepressants will remain incomplete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15740179     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200519030-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  51 in total

1.  The Cardiff sib-pair study: suicidal ideation in depressed and healthy subjects and their siblings.

Authors:  A Farmer; K Redman; T Harris; R Webb; A Mahmood; S Sadler; P McGuffin
Journal:  Crisis       Date:  2001

2.  Influence of socio-economic deprivation on the prevalence and outcome of depression in primary care: the Hampshire Depression Project.

Authors:  K Ostler; C Thompson; A L Kinmonth; R C Peveler; L Stevens; A Stevens
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 3.  Sleep disturbances and mood disorders: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  D E Ford; L Cooper-Patrick
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.505

4.  Recovery from depression, work productivity, and health care costs among primary care patients.

Authors:  G E Simon; D Revicki; J Heiligenstein; L Grothaus; M VonKorff; W J Katon; T R Hylan
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 5.  A community study of depression treatment and employment earnings.

Authors:  M Zhang; K M Rost; J C Fortney; G R Smith
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Depression predicts disability in long-term chronic pain patients.

Authors:  M Ericsson; W S C Poston; Jürgen Linder; Jennifer E Taylor; C Keith Haddock; John P Foreyt
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Depression's surprising toll on worker productivity.

Authors:  Joseph F Marlowe
Journal:  Empl Benefits J       Date:  2002-03

Review 8.  A systematic review of the mortality of depression.

Authors:  L R Wulsin; G E Vaillant; V E Wells
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  A comparison of depression and physical illness in men and women.

Authors:  M L Selzer; M Paluszny; R Carroll
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Depression and chronic fatigue in the workplace. Workers' compensation and occupational issues.

Authors:  C M Brodsky
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.907

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of venlafaxine compared with citalopram in generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhang; Hongbing Xu; Zhiqing Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.