Literature DB >> 1573985

Application of logistic regression to the analysis of diagnostic data: exact modeling of a probability tree of multiple binary variables.

J A Knottnerus1.   

Abstract

In the analysis and presentation of diagnostic relationships by means of conventional multiple logistic regression, the following limitations occur: 1) the model starts not from the prior disease odds but from the posterior disease odds for all test variables having a zero value; 2) apart from the odds ratio, other test characteristics cannot be read from the model; 3) the sequence of entering of terms is guided by pure statistical criteria and not primarily by the criterion gain in certainty; 4) interactions are not very comprehensibly represented and are difficult to interpret. A method dealing with these limitations with respect to the analysis of data on the relationships between binary tests and disease outcome is described. Essential is the transformation of any test variable x to (x - x0), where x0 is that specific (virtual) value of x so that: posterior disease odds = prior disease odds, and consequently LRx0 = 1. Moreover, a simple branching structure is introduced while the terms are entered in order of decreasing gain in certainty. Examples are given for one-, two-, and three-test situations with and without dependency and interaction of tests, and general formulas are presented. For situations with the same prior probability, and the same overall discrimination of the separate test variables, all equations clearly have a common basis. Inclusion of new variables does not affect coefficients previously included in the model, and terms without a significant contribution can be skipped without affecting other coefficients. Standard errors and confidence intervals of test characteristics can be computed using the BMDP LR program. Further study needs to be done on the inclusion of continuous variables and cost-benefit aspects, and comparison with the performance of the CART program.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573985     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  J André Knottnerus; Chris van Weel; Jean W M Muris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-23

2.  Improved diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis.

Authors:  Davinder P S Dosanjh; Timothy S C Hinks; John A Innes; Jonathan J Deeks; Geoffrey Pasvol; Sarah Hackforth; Hansa Varia; Kerry A Millington; Rubamalar Gunatheesan; Valerie Guyot-Revol; Ajit Lalvani
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The value of signs, symptoms and plasma heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) in evaluating patients presenting with symptoms possibly matching acute coronary syndrome: background and methods of a diagnostic study in primary care.

Authors:  Robert T A Willemsen; Frank Buntinx; Bjorn Winkens; Jan F Glatz; Geert Jan Dinant
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Predicting Diagnosis of Australian Canine and Feline Urinary Bladder Disease Based on Histologic Features.

Authors:  Emily Jones; John Alawneh; Mary Thompson; Chiara Palmieri; Karen Jackson; Rachel Allavena
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-27

5.  A genetic programming approach to development of clinical prediction models: A case study in symptomatic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Christian A Bannister; Julian P Halcox; Craig J Currie; Alun Preece; Irena Spasić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.