Literature DB >> 15738842

[The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

G Nuzzo1, F Giuliante, R Persiani.   

Abstract

The incidence of iatrogenic injuries of the bile ducts has increased significantly since laparascopic cholecystectomy became the "gold standard" in the treatment of cholelithiasis. The incidence of major biliary ductal injury ranges from 0.25% to 0.74%, and of minor injury from 0.28% to 1.7%. The cause of the injury is not always clearly identifiable. In more than half the cases, the injury occurs during maneuvers to isolate the cystic duct or to free the gallbladder from the common bile duct. These maneuvers may be more difficult and consequently more dangerous when there is significant inflammation as may be seen in acute cholecystitis, or in case of obesity, cirrhosis with portal hypertension, previous surgery with peritoneal adhesions, or anatomic variations of the hepatic pedicle. Pre-operative evaluation of clinical risk factors should be coupled with intra-operative caution and instrumental evaluation. The increase in frequency of iatrogenic biliary injuries can not be attributed simply to the inexperience of the surgeon or the learning curve as was initially suggested. Many injuries are due, rather, to the surgeon's failure to respect basic technical rules, long established for open cholecystectomy and which should not be modified for the laparoscopic technique. While routine cholangiography does not offer complete protection from iatrogenic ductal injuries, it is essential to visualize the biliary tract whenever a lesion of the ductal system is clearly identified or even suspected. In such cases, facility with the technique of intraoperative cholangiography and a knowledge of the radiological anatomy of the biliary tree are essential for an accurate and complete intraoperative evaluation of the biliary injury. Finally, in the presence of acute or chronic inflammation or other factors for technical difficulty (obesity, cirrhosis, previous surgery, anatomic variations, intraoperative bleeding), the surgeon must not hesitate to consider conversion to an open surgical approach. In such complicated cases, even the open approach is not a guarantee against biliary injury; there is no substitute for experience and caution in biliary surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15738842     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-7697(04)95358-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chir (Paris)        ISSN: 0021-7697


  7 in total

1.  Status of the Field of Bariatric Surgery: a National Survey of China in 2018.

Authors:  Keyu Yang; Yong Zhou; Mofei Wang; Mingyang Shen; Xiaowei Zhang; Yong Wang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Benign bile duct strictures.

Authors:  U S Dadhwal; Vipon Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-07

3.  Endoscopic management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula.

Authors:  Michael W Hii; David E Gyorki; Kentaro Sakata; Richard J Cade; Simon W Banting
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  The HAC trial (harmonic for acute cholecystitis): a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing the use of harmonic scalpel to monopolar diathermy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Fausto Catena; Salomone Di Saverio; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Massimo Sartelli; Carlo Vallicelli; Michele Cucchi; Antonio Tarasconi; Rodolfo Catena; GianLuigi De' Angelis; Hariscine Keng Abongwa; Daniel Lazzareschi; Antonio Pinna
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  [Unusual evolution of a complex bile duct injury after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  Hedfi Mohamed; Bouhafa Hala; Elcadhi Youssef; Cherif Abdelhedi; Sassi Karim; Sridi Azza; Chouchene Adnen
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  The HAC Trial (Harmonic for Acute Cholecystitis) Study. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of Harmonic(H) versus Monopolar Diathermy (M) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in adults.

Authors:  Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Salomone Di Saverio; Filippo Gazzotti; Federico Coccolini; Antonio Daniele Pinna
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  The ACTIVE (Acute Cholecystitis Trial Invasive Versus Endoscopic) study: multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of laparoscopic (LC) versus open (LTC) surgery for acute cholecystitis (AC) in adults.

Authors:  Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Salomone Di Saverio; Filippo Gazzotti; Stefano Gagliardi; Federico Coccolini; Luigi D'Alessandro; Giorgio Ercolani; Carlo Talarico; Uberto A Bassi; Leonardo Leone; Filippo Calzolari; Antonio D Pinna
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.