Literature DB >> 15738817

Fixation of revision implants is improved by a surgical technique to crack the sclerotic bone rim.

Søren Kold1, Joan E Bechtold, Olivier Mouzin, Brian Elmengaard, Xinqian Chen, Kjeld Søballe.   

Abstract

Revision joint replacement has poorer outcomes compared with primary joint replacement, and these poor outcomes have been associated with poorer fixation. We investigated a surgical technique done during the revision operation to improve access from the marrow space to the implant interface by locally cracking the sclerotic bone rim that forms during aseptic loosening. Sixteen implants were inserted bilaterally by distal femur articulation of the knee joint of eight dogs, using our controlled experimental model that replicates the revision setting (sclerotic bone rim, dense fibrous tissue, macrophages, elevated cytokines) by pistoning a loaded 6.0-mm implant 500 microm into the distal femur with particulate PE. At 8 weeks, one of two revision procedures was done. Both revision procedures included complete removal of the membrane, scraping, lavaging, and inserting a revision plasma-spray Ti implant. The crack revision procedure also used a splined tool to circumferentially locally perforate the sclerotic bone rim before insertion of an identical revision implant. Superior fixation was achieved with the cracking procedure in this experimental model. Revision implants inserted with the rim cracking procedure had a significantly higher pushout strength (fivefold median increase) and energy to failure (sixfold median increase), compared with the control revision procedure. Additional evaluation is needed of local perforation of sclerotic bone rim as a simple bone-sparing means to improve revision implant fixation and thereby increase revision implant longevity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738817     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000149815.78598.ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Do Bone Graft and Cracking of the Sclerotic Cavity Improve Fixation of Titanium and Hydroxyapatite-coated Revision Implants in an Animal Model?

Authors:  Brian Elmengaard; Joergen Baas; Thomas Jakobsen; Soren Kold; Thomas B Jensen; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated revision implants is improved by the surgical technique of cracking the sclerotic bone rim.

Authors:  Brian Elmengaard; Joan E Bechtold; Xinqian Chen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Crack revision improves fixation of uncemented HA-coated implants compared with reaming: an experiment in dogs.

Authors:  Jorgen Baas; Brian Elmengaard; Thomas Jakobsen; Joan Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  Yunfeng Tang; Zhen Zhang; Limin Wang; Wei Xiong; Qian Fang; Guanglin Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Dynamic hip system blade versus cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Li Yu; Xin Tang; Mo-Zhen Liu; Li-Zhong Sun; Changjian Liu; Zhen Zhang; Chang-Zhou Li
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 1.511

6.  A biomechanical evaluation of proximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to helical blade position in femoral head: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jin-Ho Hwang; Anant Kumar Garg; Jong-Keon Oh; Chang-Wug Oh; Sung-Jae Lee; Cho Myung-Rae; Min-Keun Kim; Hyun Kim
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.251

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.