Literature DB >> 15738676

Ovine model for engineering bone segments.

Ming-Huei Cheng1, Eric M Brey, Alexander Allori, William C Satterfield, David W Chang, Charles W Patrick, Michael J Miller.   

Abstract

We propose a large animal model for bone tissue engineering that yields quantitative data and simulates clinical methods and tissue needs. Skeletally mature domestic sheep (n = 20) were each implanted with three rectangular (1 x 1 x 4 cm), hollow tissue-molding chambers that were empty (control) or filled with equal weights (6.71-6.78 g) of particulate autologous bone graft (MBG) or bone graft that was autoclaved to denature stored growth factors (DeMBG). MBG provided scaffold and bioactive factors, and DeMBG provided only scaffold. The chambers were enclosed on five sides and securely implanted so that the open face was apposed to the osteogenic (i.e., cambium) layer of the rib periosteum for 3, 6, 9, 12, or 24 weeks, after which the chambers were harvested and the contents analyzed. Each chamber contained osseous and fibrovascular tissue. MBG-containing chambers had the best maintenance of tissue volume compared with DeMBG-containing or empty chambers, but it still decreased steadily over time. Despite this, the MBG-containing chambers showed continuous active bone formation. There was increasing calcified tissue with penetration of osteogenesis up to a mean of 0.75 +/- 0.15 cm from the periosteum by 9 weeks, and the osteogenic area peaked at 0.59 +/- 0.13 cm2 by 12 weeks. Using quantitative measures that reflect clinical needs (i.e., tissue volume, shape, and quality), it was possible to distinguish differences in performance associated with manipulation of implanted scaffold and bioactive factors. This ovine model may serve as a useful tool to develop clinical osseous tissue-engineering strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738676     DOI: 10.1089/ten.2005.11.214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng        ISSN: 1076-3279


  12 in total

1.  Localized mandibular infection affects remote in vivo bioreactor bone generation.

Authors:  Emma Watson; Brandon T Smith; Mollie M Smoak; Alexander M Tatara; Sarita R Shah; Hannah A Pearce; Katie J Hogan; Jonathan Shum; James C Melville; Issa A Hanna; Nagi Demian; Joseph C Wenke; George N Bennett; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Strategies for vascularization of polymer scaffolds.

Authors:  Georgia Papavasiliou; Ming-Huei Cheng; Eric M Brey
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Large Animal Models of an In Vivo Bioreactor for Engineering Vascularized Bone.

Authors:  Banu Akar; Alexander M Tatara; Alok Sutradhar; Hui-Yi Hsiao; Michael Miller; Ming-Huei Cheng; Antonios G Mikos; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  An Ovine Model of In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation.

Authors:  Emma Watson; Alexander M Tatara; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 5.  In vivo bioreactors for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Tatara; M E Wong; A G Mikos
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Autologously generated tissue-engineered bone flaps for reconstruction of large mandibular defects in an ovine model.

Authors:  Alexander M Tatara; James D Kretlow; Patrick P Spicer; Steven Lu; Johnny Lam; Wei Liu; Yilin Cao; Guangpeng Liu; John D Jackson; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; John A Jansen; F Kurtis Kasper; Tang Ho; Nagi Demian; Michael John Miller; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Investigation of a Prevascularized Bone Graft for Large Defects in the Ovine Tibia.

Authors:  Yunzhi Peter Yang; Benjamin C Gadomski; Arnaud Bruyas; Jeremiah Easley; Kevin M Labus; Brad Nelson; Ross H Palmer; Holly Stewart; Kirk McGilvray; Christian M Puttlitz; Dan Regan; Alexander Stahl; Elaine Lui; Jiannan Li; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Sungwoo Kim; William Maloney; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 8.  Engineering clinically relevant volumes of vascularized bone.

Authors:  Brianna M Roux; Ming-Huei Cheng; Eric M Brey
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  A sheep model for cancellous bone healing.

Authors:  Angad Malhotra; Matthew Henry Pelletier; Yan Yu; Chris Christou; William Robert Walsh
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2014-09-08

10.  GNAS1 and PHD2 short-interfering RNA support bone regeneration in vitro and in an in vivo sheep model.

Authors:  Carmen N Ríos; Roman J Skoracki; Anshu B Mathur
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.