Literature DB >> 15738405

Extinction dynamics in experimental metapopulations.

Jane Molofsky1, Jean-Baptiste Ferdy.   

Abstract

Metapopulation theory provides a framework for understanding population persistence in fragmented landscapes and as such has been widely used in conservation biology to inform management of fragmented populations. However, classical metapopulation theory [Levins, R. (1970) Lect. Notes Math. 2, 75-107] ignores metapopulation structure and local population dynamics, both of which may affect extinction dynamics. Here, we investigate metapopulation dynamics in populations that are subject to different migration rates by using experimental metapopulations of the annual plant Cardamine pensylvanica. As predicted by classical metapopulation theory, connected populations persisted longer than did isolated populations, but the relationship between migration and persistence time was nonlinear. Extinction risk sharply increased as the distance between local populations increased above a threshold value that was consistent with stochastic simulations and calculation of metapopulation capacity [Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. (2000) Nature 404, 755-758]. In addition, the most connected metapopulations did not have the highest persistence levels. Stochastic simulations indicated an increase in extinction risk with the highest migration rates. Moreover, calculation of population coherence [Earn, D. J. D., Levin, S. A. & Rohani, P. (2000) Science 290, 1360-1364], a metric that predicts synchronous cycles, indicated that continuous populations should cycle in phase, resulting in an increased extinction risk. Determining empirically the optimal migration level to improve survival chances will be challenging for any natural population. Migration rates that would not increase migration above the threshold value would be ineffectual, but migration rates that would homogenize local densities could increase the risk of coherent oscillations and enhance extinction risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738405      PMCID: PMC553292          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404576102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  I Hanski; O Ovaskainen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Coherence and conservation.

Authors:  D J Earn; S A Levin; P Rohani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Unexpected coherence and conservation.

Authors:  B Cazelles; S Bottani; L Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity.

Authors:  O Ovaskainen; I Hanski
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Long-term persistence of species and the SLOSS problem.

Authors:  Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes.

Authors:  Otso Ovaskainen; Kazunori Sato; Jordi Bascompte; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Habitat destruction, habitat restoration and eigenvector-eigenvalue relations.

Authors:  Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.144

8.  Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Ilkka Hanski; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds.

Authors:  S K Robinson; F R Thompson; T M Donovan; D R Whitehead; J Faaborg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Synchronization-induced persistence versus selection for habitats in spatially coupled ecosystems.

Authors:  Adam Lampert; Alan Hastings
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Environment, but not migration rate, influences extinction risk in experimental metapopulations.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato.

Authors:  Yaniv Semel; Jonathan Nissenbaum; Naama Menda; Michael Zinder; Uri Krieger; Noa Issman; Tzili Pleban; Zachary Lippman; Amit Gur; Dani Zamir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spatial coherence and the persistence of high diversity in spatially heterogeneous landscapes.

Authors:  Ankit Vikrant; Susanne Pettersson; Martin Nilsson Jacobi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Experimental beetle metapopulations respond positively to dynamic landscapes and reduced connectivity.

Authors:  Byju N Govindan; Robert K Swihart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Species survival emerge from rare events of individual migration.

Authors:  Yuval R Zelnik; Sorin Solomon; Gur Yaari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Migration alters oscillatory dynamics and promotes survival in connected bacterial populations.

Authors:  Shreyas Gokhale; Arolyn Conwill; Tanvi Ranjan; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Spatial heterogeneity enhance robustness of large multi-species ecosystems.

Authors:  Susanne Pettersson; Martin Nilsson Jacobi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Optimizing metapopulation sustainability through a checkerboard strategy.

Authors:  Yossi Ben Zion; Gur Yaari; Nadav M Shnerb
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Experimental demonstration of accelerated extinction in source-sink metapopulations.

Authors:  John M Drake; Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.