Literature DB >> 15738368

Forgoing treatment at the end of life in 6 European countries.

Georg Bosshard1, Tore Nilstun, Johan Bilsen, Michael Norup, Guido Miccinesi, Johannes J M van Delden, Karin Faisst, Agnes van der Heide.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern medicine provides unprecedented opportunities in diagnostics and treatment. However, in some situations at the end of a patient's life, many physicians refrain from using all possible measures to prolong life. We studied the incidence of different types of treatment withheld or withdrawn in 6 European countries and analyzed the main background characteristics.
METHODS: Between June 2001 and February 2002, samples were obtained from deaths reported to registries in Belgium, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. The reporting physician was then sent a questionnaire about the medical decision-making process that preceded the patient's death.
RESULTS: The incidence of nontreatment decisions, whether or not combined with other end-of-life decisions, varied widely from 6% of all deaths studied in Italy to 41% in Switzerland. Most frequently forgone in every country were hydration or nutrition and medication, together representing between 62% (Belgium) and 71% (Italy) of all treatments withheld or withdrawn. Forgoing treatment estimated to prolong life for more than 1 month was more common in the Netherlands (10%), Belgium (9%), and Switzerland (8%) than in Denmark (5%), Italy (3%), and Sweden (2%). Relevant determinants of treatment being withheld rather than withdrawn were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.79), death outside the hospital (death in hospital: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93), and greater life-shortening effect (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.27-2.39).
CONCLUSIONS: In all of the participating countries, life-prolonging treatment is withheld or withdrawn at the end of life. Frequencies vary greatly among countries. Low-technology interventions, such as medication or hydration or nutrition, are most frequently forgone. In older patients and outside the hospital, physicians prefer not to initiate life-prolonging treatment at all rather than stop it later.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738368     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.4.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  16 in total

1.  End of life issues in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Andrea Pace; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Lara Guariglia; Bruno Jandolo; Carmine M Carapella; Alfredo Pompili
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Admissions to inpatient care facilities in the last year of life of community-dwelling older people in Europe.

Authors:  Anouk Overbeek; Lieve Van den Block; Ida J Korfage; Yolanda W H Penders; Agnes van der Heide; Judith A C Rietjens
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Can curative or life-sustaining treatment be withheld or withdrawn? The opinions and views of Indian palliative-care nurses and physicians.

Authors:  Joris Gielen; Sushma Bhatnagar; Seema Mishra; Arvind K Chaturvedi; Harmala Gupta; Ambika Rajvanshi; Stef Van den Branden; Bert Broeckaert
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-02

4.  The influence of age on the likelihood of receiving end-of-life care consistent with patient treatment preferences.

Authors:  John D Parr; Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Alexi Wright; Tracy Balboni; Edmund Duthie; Elizabeth Paulk; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Intentionally hastening death by withholding or withdrawing treatment.

Authors:  Georg Bosshard; Susanne Fischer; Agnes van der Heide; Guido Miccinesi; Karin Faisst
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Identifying the palliative care needs of patients living with cerebral tumors and metastases: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Teneille E Gofton; Jerome Graber; Alan Carver
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Continuing, Withdrawing, and Withholding Medical Treatment at the End of Life and Associated Characteristics: a Mortality Follow-back Study.

Authors:  Yolanda W H Penders; Matthias Bopp; Ueli Zellweger; Georg Bosshard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework.

Authors:  Eva C Winkler; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Age-based disparities in end-of-life decisions in Belgium: a population-based death certificate survey.

Authors:  Kenneth Chambaere; Judith A C Rietjens; Tinne Smets; Johan Bilsen; Reginald Deschepper; H Roeline W Pasman; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Physicians' experiences with end-of-life decision-making: survey in 6 European countries and Australia.

Authors:  Rurik Löfmark; Tore Nilstun; Colleen Cartwright; Susanne Fischer; Agnes van der Heide; Freddy Mortier; Michael Norup; Lorenzo Simonato; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.