Literature DB >> 15738260

Performance of lactating dairy cows managed on pasture-based or in freestall barn-feeding systems.

R S Fontaneli1, L E Sollenberger, R C Littell, C R Staples.   

Abstract

The objective was to compare productive and metabolic responses of lactating dairy cows managed on 2 pasture-based systems using a concentrate supplement (n = 16) with those of a freestall housing system (n = 24). In a 259-d experiment, 3 multiparous Holstein cows were assigned at calving to each of 4 replicates of 2 pasture systems. For system 1, winter pastures were a mixture of rye, ryegrass, and crimson and red clover; summer pastures were pearl millet. Pasture system 2 included a rye-ryegrass mixture during winter and bermudagrass during summer. Pregraze herbage mass averaged 2.3 and 3.6 Mg/ha for winter and summer pastures, respectively; however, during August through September, pearl millet pregraze mass was reduced to about 1 Mg/ha. Daily dry matter intake by cows on pasture averaged 24.7 kg/d in winter and 19.0 kg/d in summer, of which 55% was from pasture; that of cows in confined-housing averaged 23.6 kg/d. Cows in confinement produced 19% more milk (29.8 vs. 25.1 kg/d) than those on pasture systems. Differences in concentration of milk fat, protein, or urea N were not detected among treatment groups. Grazing cows lost more body weight than confined cows (113 vs. 58 kg) and had lower concentrations of plasma glucose in the early weeks postpartum. Despite greater milk yield by cows housed in freestalls, milk income minus feed costs including that of pasture was similar for the 3 management systems. Although these pasture systems might be a viable management system in the southeastern US, extensive loss of body weight immediately postpartum for pasture-based cows are a potential concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738260     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72793-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Ovarian evaluation of Girolando (Holstein × Gir) heifers submitted to a GnRH-PGF2α-GnRH protocol in the dry or rainy seasons in the tropical savannah.

Authors:  Ubirajara O Bilego; Fabricio C Santos; Regiani N G Porto; Bruno C Pires; Benedito D Oliveira Filho; Marco Antonio O Viu; Maria Lúcia Gambarini
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Comparison of several methods of sires evaluation for total milk yield in a herd of Holstein cows in Yemen.

Authors:  F R Al-Samarai; Y K Abdulrahman; F A Mohammed; F H Al-Zaidi; N N Al-Anbari
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2015-02-14

3.  Impact of Daily Grazing Time on Dairy Cow Welfare-Results of the Welfare Quality® Protocol.

Authors:  Kathrin Wagner; Jan Brinkmann; Solveig March; Peter Hinterstoißer; Sylvia Warnecke; Maximilian Schüler; Hans Marten Paulsen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

Review 5.  Production performance, nutrient use efficiency, and predicted enteric methane emissions in dairy cows under confinement or grazing management system.

Authors:  Andre F Brito; Kleves V Almeida; Andre S Oliveira
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-26

6.  A Case Study of Behaviour and Performance of Confined or Pastured Cows During the Dry Period.

Authors:  Randi A Black; Peter D Krawczel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.