Literature DB >> 15738013

Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma.

Inbar Ben-Shachar1, James Pavelka, David E Cohn, Larry J Copeland, Nilsa Ramirez, Tom Manolitsas, Jeffrey M Fowler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of surgical staging of patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer.
METHODS: The charts of all patients who presented for surgery for endometrial cancer between March 1997 and July 2003 were analyzed for demographic data, final tumor histology, grade, stage, and complications.
RESULTS: A total of 349 patients underwent surgical management for endometrial cancer. Preoperatively, 181 (52%) were identified with grade 1 disease, with a mean age of 61 years (range 27-89). Surgical staging (pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy) was performed in 82% of cases and was omitted only in cases when disease was apparently confined to the endometrium and surgical risk was high. In staged patients, 3.2% had severe surgical complications. There were 2 perioperative mortalities (1 pulmonary emboli and 1 myocardial infarct). In comparison of pre- and postoperative histology, 19% of patients were upgraded, with 15% grade 2, 0.5% grade 3, 2.5% serous or clear cell, and 1% mixed mesodermal tumor. Lymph node metastases were found in 3.9% of patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer, and 10.5% had extrauterine spread (> IIb). High-risk uterine features, including myometrial invasion more than 1/2, grade 3 lesions, high-risk histologic variants, and/or cervical involvement, were found in 26% of the patients. No patients with stage Ia-IIb endometrioid cancer received adjuvant teletherapy or chemotherapy. Four patients with low-risk uterine features were found to have extrauterine disease. Twelve percent of patients received adjuvant therapy, and 17% avoided teletherapy and/or chemotherapy based on surgical staging.
CONCLUSION: Surgical staging in patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer significantly impacted postoperative treatment decisions in 29% of patients. Omitting lymphadenectomy in patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer may lead to inappropriate postoperative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738013     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000149151.74863.c4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  23 in total

1.  Serum endocan levels in endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Esra Laloglu; Yakup Kumtepe; Hulya Aksoy; Emsal Pınar Topdagi Yilmaz
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Comparison of preoperative endometrial biopsy grade and final pathologic diagnosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Behiye Pınar Çilesiz Göksedef; Ozgür Akbayır; Aytül Corbacıoğlu; Hakan Güraslan; Fatmagül Sencan; Onur Erol; Ahmet Cetin
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01

3.  Intraoperative staging by surgeons in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation: diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Woo Yong Lee; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Endometrial Cancer: Combined MR Volumetry and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Assessment of Myometrial and Lymphovascular Invasion and Tumor Grade.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Caroline Reinhold; Shaza S Alsharif; Helen Addley; Jocelyne Arceneau; Nicolas Molinari; Boris Guiu; Evis Sala
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Prediction of staging with preoperative parameters and frozen/section in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of grade 1 endometrioid tumor in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Alper Karalok; Işın Ureyen; Yıldız Reis; Ozge Oktay; Taner Turan; Nurettin Boran; Dilek Bülbül; Gökhan Tulunay; Mehmet Faruk Köse
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-01-30

6.  Obesity does not affect the number of retrieved lymph nodes and the rate of intraoperative complications in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Mehmet Coskun Salman; Alp Usubutun; Tulay Ozlu; Kubra Boynukalin; Kunter Yuce
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R Seracchioli; S Solfrini; M Mabrouk; C Facchini; N Di Donato; L Manuzzi; L Savelli; S Venturoli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-23

8.  Systemic lymphadenectomy cannot be recommended for low-risk corpus cancer.

Authors:  Takao Hidaka; Akitoshi Nakashima; Tomoko Shima; Toru Hasegawa; Shigeru Saito
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-02-04

9.  Significance of concurrent endometrial cancer in women with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

Authors:  Kurt Christopher Giede; Tin-Wing Yen; Rajni Chibbar; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-10

10.  Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: Earlier prognostic information to guide treatment.

Authors:  Aline Talhouk; Lien N Hoang; Melissa K McConechy; Quentin Nakonechny; Joyce Leo; Angela Cheng; Samuel Leung; Winnie Yang; Amy Lum; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Robert A Soslow; David G Huntsman; C Blake Gilks; Jessica N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.