Cheryl M D'Souza1, Sara F Forman, S Bryn Austin. 1. Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. cherds@adelphia.net
Abstract
PURPOSE: To conduct a regional, follow-up evaluation to assess the implementation and effectiveness of the National Eating Disorders Screening Program (NEDSP), conducted in high schools nationwide in the spring of 2000. METHODS: Four New England high schools participated in a postscreen evaluation 1 to 2 months after implementation of NEDSP. A 35-item, self-report postscreen survey was administered to students in classrooms with assistance from school health staff and teachers. School staff involved in the screening were also interviewed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds that students talked to an adult or peers about their screening score. RESULTS: Data from 592 girls and 435 boys were included in the analysis in the four high schools participating in the program evaluation. NEDSP helped to identify students at risk and encouraged students to speak to others about their screening score and eating disorder symptoms. One-quarter of girls and one-fifth of boys reported talking with at least one adult about their EAT-26 screening score. Girls felt more strongly than boys that the program helped them learn about eating disorders, change their thinking related to eating disorders and body image, and talk to friends about eating disorders. Overall, the students felt that the program was helpful and would recommend it to their friends. CONCLUSIONS: Early detection of eating disorders in adolescents may shorten the interval between onset of symptoms and treatment, which has the potential to reduce the length of illness and morbidity associated with untreated eating disorders. Our findings suggest that high-school-based screening may be an effective way to facilitate early detection of eating disorder symptoms in adolescents.
PURPOSE: To conduct a regional, follow-up evaluation to assess the implementation and effectiveness of the National Eating Disorders Screening Program (NEDSP), conducted in high schools nationwide in the spring of 2000. METHODS: Four New England high schools participated in a postscreen evaluation 1 to 2 months after implementation of NEDSP. A 35-item, self-report postscreen survey was administered to students in classrooms with assistance from school health staff and teachers. School staff involved in the screening were also interviewed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds that students talked to an adult or peers about their screening score. RESULTS: Data from 592 girls and 435 boys were included in the analysis in the four high schools participating in the program evaluation. NEDSP helped to identify students at risk and encouraged students to speak to others about their screening score and eating disorder symptoms. One-quarter of girls and one-fifth of boys reported talking with at least one adult about their EAT-26 screening score. Girls felt more strongly than boys that the program helped them learn about eating disorders, change their thinking related to eating disorders and body image, and talk to friends about eating disorders. Overall, the students felt that the program was helpful and would recommend it to their friends. CONCLUSIONS: Early detection of eating disorders in adolescents may shorten the interval between onset of symptoms and treatment, which has the potential to reduce the length of illness and morbidity associated with untreated eating disorders. Our findings suggest that high-school-based screening may be an effective way to facilitate early detection of eating disorder symptoms in adolescents.
Authors: Emma Soneson; Jasmine Childs-Fegredo; Joanna K Anderson; Jan Stochl; Mina Fazel; Tamsin Ford; Ayla Humphrey; Peter B Jones; Emma Howarth Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-12-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Nicholas Woodrow; Hannah Fairbrother; Katie Breheny; Katrina d'Apice; Patricia N Albers; Clare Mills; Matthew Curtis; Lisa Hopkins; Sarah Tebbett; Rona Campbell; Frank De Vocht Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Emma Soneson; Emma Howarth; Tamsin Ford; Ayla Humphrey; Peter B Jones; Jo Thompson Coon; Morwenna Rogers; Joanna K Anderson Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2020-07
Authors: S Bryn Austin; Najat J Ziyadeh; Sara Forman; Lisa A Prokop; Anne Keliher; Douglas Jacobs Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830