Literature DB >> 15736774

Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation--a retrospective study.

Mauro Fradeani1, Marco Redemagni, Marcantonio Corrado.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical performance of laminate veneers placed in the anterior segments of the dental arches over a 12-year period at two different private dental practices. Forty-six patients were restored with 182 porcelain laminate veneers. The veneers were studied for a mean observation time of 5.69 years. Color match, porcelain surface, marginal discoloration, and marginal integrity were clinically examined following modified CDA/Ryge criteria. On the basis of the criteria used, most of the veneers rated A. Risk of fracture was determined with a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Probability of survival of the 182 veneers was 94.4% at 12 years, with a low clinical failure rate (approximately 5.6%). Porcelain veneers must be bonded with a correct adhesive technique to reach this successful survival rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15736774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Fatigue of dentin-composite interfaces with four-point bend.

Authors:  Michal Staninec; Paul Kim; Grayson W Marshall; R O Ritchie; Sally J Marshall
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 2.  Recent advances in materials for all-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Jason A Griggs
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2007-07

3.  Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months.

Authors:  Marco M M Gresnigt; Warner Kalk; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.

Authors:  Petra C Guess; Stefan Schultheis; Martin Wolkewitz; Yu Zhang; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Mustafa Demirci; Safa Tuncer; Evren Öztaş; Neslihan Tekçe; Ömer Uysal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years.

Authors:  Camillo D'Arcangelo; Francesco De Angelis; Mirco Vadini; Maurizio D'Amario
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Esthetic improvement in the patient with one missing maxillary central incisor restored with porcelain laminate veneers.

Authors:  Dong-Jin Park; Jae-Ho Yang; Jai-Bong Lee; Sung-Hun Kim; Jung-Suk Han
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Design features of a three-dimensional molar crown and related maximum principal stress. A finite element model study.

Authors:  Brian T Rafferty; Malvin N Janal; Ricardo A Zavanelli; Nelson R F A Silva; E Dianne Rekow; Van P Thompson; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 9.  Dental Ceramics for Restoration and Metal Veneering.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; J Robert Kelly
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

10.  The esthetic rehabilitation of misplaced dental arch after fracture of anterior maxillae: a case report.

Authors:  Suha Turkaslan; Cagri Turna
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.