OBJECTIVES: The use of economic evaluation studies (EE) in the decision-making process within the health-care system of nine Latin American (LA) and three European countries was investigated. The aim was to identify the opportunities, obstacles, and changes needed to facilitate the introduction of EE as a formal tool in health-care decision-making processes in LA. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted based on existing literature and information provided through a questionnaire applied to decision makers in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Portugal Spain, United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Systematic electronic searches of HEED, NHS EED, and LILACS were conducted to identify published economic evaluation studies in LA from 1982 onward. RESULTS: There is relatively little evidence of the conduct and use of EE within the health care systems in LA. Electronic searches retrieved 554 records; however, only 93 were EE. In the nine LA participating countries, broad allocation of health-care resources is primarily based on political criteria, historical records, geographical areas, and specific groups of patients and diseases. Public-health provision and inclusion of services in health-insurance package are responsibilities of the Ministry of Health. Decisions regarding the purchase of medicines are primarily made through public tenders, and mainly based on differences in clinical efficacy and the price of health technologies of interest. CONCLUSIONS: To expedite the process of incorporating EE as a formal tool to inform decision-making processes within the health-care systems in LA countries, two main conditions need to be fulfilled. First, adequate resources and skills need to be available to conduct EE of good quality. Second, decision-making procedures need to be modified to accommodate "evidence-based" approaches such as EE.
OBJECTIVES: The use of economic evaluation studies (EE) in the decision-making process within the health-care system of nine Latin American (LA) and three European countries was investigated. The aim was to identify the opportunities, obstacles, and changes needed to facilitate the introduction of EE as a formal tool in health-care decision-making processes in LA. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted based on existing literature and information provided through a questionnaire applied to decision makers in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Portugal Spain, United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Systematic electronic searches of HEED, NHS EED, and LILACS were conducted to identify published economic evaluation studies in LA from 1982 onward. RESULTS: There is relatively little evidence of the conduct and use of EE within the health care systems in LA. Electronic searches retrieved 554 records; however, only 93 were EE. In the nine LA participating countries, broad allocation of health-care resources is primarily based on political criteria, historical records, geographical areas, and specific groups of patients and diseases. Public-health provision and inclusion of services in health-insurance package are responsibilities of the Ministry of Health. Decisions regarding the purchase of medicines are primarily made through public tenders, and mainly based on differences in clinical efficacy and the price of health technologies of interest. CONCLUSIONS: To expedite the process of incorporating EE as a formal tool to inform decision-making processes within the health-care systems in LA countries, two main conditions need to be fulfilled. First, adequate resources and skills need to be available to conduct EE of good quality. Second, decision-making procedures need to be modified to accommodate "evidence-based" approaches such as EE.
Authors: Jon Kim Andrus; Cristiana M Toscano; Merle Lewis; Lucia Oliveira; Lucia Oliveiria; Alba Maria Ropero; Michael Dávila; John W Fitzsimmons Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Federico Ariel Augustovski; Vilma Edit Irazola; Alberto Pascual Velazquez; Luz Gibbons; Benjamin M Craig Journal: Value Health Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Mohammad E Hoque; Jahangir Am Khan; Shahed Sa Hossain; Rukhsana Gazi; Harun-Ar Rashid; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Damian G Walker Journal: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Date: 2011-07-20
Authors: Damian G Walker; Cristian Aedo; Cecilia Albala; Elizabeth Allen; Alan D Dangour; Diana Elbourne; Emily Grundy; Ricardo Uauy Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mark Jit; Carol Levin; Marc Brisson; Ann Levin; Stephen Resch; Johannes Berkhof; Jane Kim; Raymond Hutubessy Journal: BMC Med Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 8.775