Literature DB >> 15734951

Soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) [corrected] and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) as screening and diagnostic tests for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Andre T Baron1, Cecelia H Boardman, Jacqueline M Lafky, Alfred Rademaker, Dachao Liu, David A Fishman, Karl C Podratz, Nita J Maihle.   

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death among all gynecologic cancers in the United States. Because women who are diagnosed with early stage disease have a better prognosis than women diagnosed with late stage disease, early detection represents a potentially practical approach to reduce the mortality associated with EOC. Unfortunately, no single screening test has proven to be effective for this purpose, and a valid and feasible screening program to detect early stage EOC in the general population has not yet been devised. Consequently, research has focused on coupling two or more screening modalities to improve program validity and feasibility. Serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and a soluble isoform of the epidermal growth factor receptor (p110 sEGFR) have been studied individually as biomarkers of ovarian cancer. In this study, we compare serum CA125 levels and sEGFR concentrations in women with EOC to women with benign gynecologic conditions of ovarian and non-ovarian origin. We show that serum sEGFR concentrations are lower in patients with EOC than in women with benign gynecologic conditions, whereas serum CA125 levels are higher in patients to EOC compared with women with benign gynecologic conditions. These data also reveal that age and serum sEGFR concentrations modify the association between CA125 levels and EOC versus benign gynecologic disease. Hence, age- and sEGFR-dependent CA125 cutoff thresholds improve the ability of CA125 to discern EOC patients from women with benign ovarian tumors and non-ovarian gynecologic conditions. Our analyses show that parallel testing with fixed sEGFR and CA125 cutoff thresholds optimizes sensitivity to detect EOC, whereas serial testing with age- and sEGFR-dependent CA125 cutoff thresholds optimizes test specificity, and overall accuracy to discern patients with EOC from women with benign ovarian and non-ovarian gynecologic conditions. The combined use of serologic sEGFR and CA125, thus, has improved utility for screening and diagnosing EOC, which may increase the positive predictive value of a multimodal screening program that incorporates these biomarkers to detect and subsequently differentiate benign from malignant ovarian tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734951     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  18 in total

1.  The epidemiology of CA-125 in women without evidence of ovarian cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial.

Authors:  Christine C Johnson; Bruce Kessel; Thomas L Riley; Lawrence R Ragard; Craig R Williams; Jian-Lun Xu; Saundra S Buys
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  A phase II evaluation of gefitinib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Kimberly K Leslie; Michael W Sill; Edgar Fischer; Kathleen M Darcy; Robert S Mannel; Krishnansu S Tewari; Parviz Hanjani; Jason A Wilken; Andre T Baron; Andrew K Godwin; Russell J Schilder; Meenakshi Singh; Nita J Maihle
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Giant serous papillary cystadenoma.

Authors:  Madhusudan Dey; Niloy Pathak
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-08-07

4.  Toward an integrative analysis of the tumor microenvironment in ovarian epithelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ryan N Serio
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2011-11-23

5.  Cetuximab pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics relationships in advanced head and neck carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Félicien Le Louedec; Catherine Alix-Panabières; Thierry Lafont; Ben C Allal; Renaud Garrel; Laurence Digue; Joël Guigay; Didier Cupissol; Jean-Pierre Delord; Benjamin Lallemant; Marc Alfonsi; Karine Aubry; Martine Mazel; François Becher; Françoise Perriard; Etienne Chatelut; Fabienne Thomas
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 125 level is an independent negative prognostic marker for overall survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xue-Qin Yang; Yan Li; Chuang Chen; Chun-Wei Peng; Shao-ping Liu; Yang Liu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Implantable diagnostic device for cancer monitoring.

Authors:  Karen D Daniel; Grace Y Kim; Christophoros C Vassiliou; Marilyn Galindo; Alexander R Guimaraes; Ralph Weissleder; Al Charest; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 8.  Activated epidermal growth factor receptor in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Laurie G Hudson; Reema Zeineldin; Melina Silberberg; M Sharon Stack
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2009

9.  Nano-bio-chips for high performance multiplexed protein detection: determinations of cancer biomarkers in serum and saliva using quantum dot bioconjugate labels.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Archana Raamanathan; Nicolaos Christodoulides; Pierre N Floriano; Amanda A Pollard; Glennon W Simmons; Jorge Wong; Carole Gage; Wieslaw B Furmaga; Spencer W Redding; John T McDevitt
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 10.618

10.  Identification of a biomarker panel using a multiplex proximity ligation assay improves accuracy of pancreatic cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Stephanie T Chang; Jacob M Zahn; Joe Horecka; Pamela L Kunz; James M Ford; George A Fisher; Quynh T Le; Daniel T Chang; Hanlee Ji; Albert C Koong
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.