Literature DB >> 15734792

Gating of aquaporins by low temperature in roots of chilling-sensitive cucumber and chilling-tolerant figleaf gourd.

Seong Hee Lee1, Gap Chae Chung, Ernst Steudle.   

Abstract

Effects of low temperature (8 degrees C) on the hydraulic conductivity of young roots of a chilling-sensitive (cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.) and a chilling-resistant (figleaf gourd, Cucurbita ficifolia Bouche) crop have been measured at the levels of whole root systems (root hydraulic conductivity, Lp(r)) and of individual cortical cells (cell hydraulic conductivity, Lp). Exposure of roots to low temperature (LRT) for up to 6 d caused a stronger suberization of the endodermis in cucumber compared with figleaf gourd, but no development of exodermal Casparian bands in either species. Changes in anatomy after 6 d of LRT treatment corresponded with a reduction in hydrostatic root Lp(r) of cucumber roots by a factor of 24, and by a factor of 2 in figleaf gourd. In figleaf gourd, there was a reduction only in hydrostatic Lp(r) but not in osmotic Lp(r) suggesting that the activity of water channels was not much affected by LRT treatment in this species. Changes in cell Lp in response to chilling and recovery were similar to the root levels, although they were more intense at the root level. Activation energies (E(a)) and Q10 of water flow as measured at the cell level were high in cucumber (E(a)=109+/-13 kJ mol(-1); Q(10)=4.8+/-0.7; n=6-10 cells), but small in figleaf gourd (E(a)=11+/-2 kJ mol(-1); Q10=1.2+/-0.1; n=6-10 cells). Roots of figleaf gourd recovered better from LRT treatment than those of cucumber. In figleaf gourd, recovery (at both the root and cell level) often resulted in Lp and Lp(r) values which were even bigger than the original, i.e. there was an overshoot in hydraulic conductivity. These effects were larger for osmotic (representing the cell-to-cell passage of water) than for hydrostatic Lp(r). After a short-term (1 d) exposure to 8 degrees C followed by 1 d at 20 degrees C, hydrostatic Lp(r) of cucumber nearly recovered and that of figleaf gourd still remained higher due to the overshoot. By contrast, osmotic Lp(r) and cell Lp in both species remained high by a factor of 3 compared with the control, possibly due to an increased activity of water channels. After preconditioning of roots at LRT, increased hydraulic conductivity was completely inhibited by HgCl2 at both the root and cell levels. Different from figleaf gourd, recovery from chilling was not complete in cucumber after longer exposure to LRT. It is concluded that at LRT, both changes in the activity of aquaporins (AQPs) and alterations of root anatomy determine the water uptake in both species. The high temperature dependence of cell Lp in cucumber suggests conformational changes of AQPs during LRT treatment which result in channel closure and in a strong gating of AQP activity by low temperature. This mechanism is thought to be different from that in figleaf gourd where AQPs reacted in the conventional way, i.e. low temperature affected the mobility of water molecules in AQPs rather than their open/closed state, and Q(10) was low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734792     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  15 in total

1.  Transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco plants overexpressing an aquaporin respond differently to various abiotic stresses.

Authors:  Ji Young Jang; Seong Hee Lee; Ji Ye Rhee; Gap Chae Chung; Sung Ju Ahn; Hunseung Kang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 2.  Emerging roles of aquaporins in relation to the physiology of blood-feeding arthropods.

Authors:  Joshua B Benoit; Immo A Hansen; Elise M Szuter; Lisa L Drake; Denielle L Burnett; Geoffrey M Attardo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Overexpression of PIP2;5 aquaporin alleviates effects of low root temperature on cell hydraulic conductivity and growth in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Seong Hee Lee; Gap Chae Chung; Ji Young Jang; Sung Ju Ahn; Janusz J Zwiazek
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Osmotic water permeability of plasma and vacuolar membranes in protoplasts I: high osmotic water permeability in radish (Raphanus sativus) root cells as measured by a new method.

Authors:  Mari Murai-Hatano; Tsuneo Kuwagata
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Root apoplastic barriers block Na+ transport to shoots in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Pannaga Krishnamurthy; Kosala Ranathunge; Shraddha Nayak; Lukas Schreiber; M K Mathew
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Genome duplication improves rice root resistance to salt stress.

Authors:  Yi Tu; Aiming Jiang; Lu Gan; Mokter Hossain; Jinming Zhang; Bo Peng; Yuguo Xiong; Zhaojian Song; Detian Cai; Weifeng Xu; Jianhua Zhang; Yuchi He
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.783

7.  Root-Zone Warming Differently Benefits Mature and Newly Unfolded Leaves of Cucumis sativus L. Seedlings under Sub-Optimal Temperature Stress.

Authors:  Xiaozhuo Wang; Weihua Zhang; Yanxiu Miao; Lihong Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Water Status Related Root-to-Shoot Communication Regulates the Chilling Tolerance of Shoot in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Plants.

Authors:  Zi-Shan Zhang; Mei-Jun Liu; Hui-Yuan Gao; Li-Qiao Jin; Yu-Ting Li; Qing-Ming Li; Xi-Zhen Ai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Root hydraulic conductivity measured by pressure clamp is substantially affected by internal unstirred layers.

Authors:  Thorsten Knipfer; Ernst Steudle
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Low temperature limits for root growth in alpine species are set by cell differentiation.

Authors:  Sebastian Nagelmüller; Erika Hiltbrunner; Christian Körner
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.